Eigenvalues for X’s Pauli's matrix

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter USeptim
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvalues Matrix
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the X coordinate Pauli matrix, represented as [[0, 1], [1, 0]]. The initial claim of orthogonality between the eigenvectors ψ_1 = [1, 1] and ψ_2 = [i, i] is refuted, as they are not linearly independent. The correct orthogonal eigenvectors are identified as [1, 1] and [1, -1], which maintain the necessary orthogonality and phase considerations when applying the Sx operator.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and spinors
  • Familiarity with linear algebra concepts, particularly eigenvalues and eigenvectors
  • Knowledge of Pauli matrices and their applications in quantum mechanics
  • Basic understanding of complex numbers and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Pauli matrices in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the significance of eigenvalues and eigenvectors in quantum state representation
  • Explore the concept of phase factors in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the application of the Sx operator on quantum states
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone studying the mathematical foundations of quantum states and operators.

USeptim
Messages
98
Reaction score
5
Let it be the X coordinate Pauli's matrix:
\begin{array}{ccc}
0 & 1 \\
1 & 0 \end{array}

According to my calculations, it's eigenvectors would require that the spinor components to take the same value, but then, in order to have two orthogonal eigenvectors, we would need the complex components to be orthogonal when doing the dot product.

I choose the eigenvectors ψ_1 =[1, 1] and ψ_2 = [i, i]. Then the dot product must be

ψ_1 · ψ_2 = 1 · i + 1 · i = 0.

That means that orthogonal phases inside the same spinor component must be treated as orthogonal components. Is that true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. Your ψ_2 is proportional your ψ_1; they are not linearly independent. Their dot product of is 2i, not zero. Try [1, 1] and [1, -1] as a complete set of orthogonal eigenvectors.
 
Thanks The_duck.

With [1, -1] after I pass the Sx operator I'll get [-1, 1], it's the same vector with a diferent phase so it's a valid eigenvector.

My mistake was that I forgot the phase factor after the operator. For the [1,1] vector the phase is 0 and for the [-1, 1] it's ∏.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K