Eigenvalues of a Linear Transformation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the eigenvalues of a linear transformation represented by the matrix \(A^{t}.A\), where \(A\) consists of vectors \(a_1, \ldots, a_n\). Participants explore the properties of the symmetric matrix and methods for determining its eigenvalues, including potential approaches and corrections to earlier claims.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the matrix \(A^{t}.A\) and notes its symmetry, suggesting it can be expressed as \(A^{t}.A=QDQ^T\) for some orthogonal matrix \(Q\) and diagonal matrix \(D\).
  • Another participant claims to find an eigenvalue \(\lambda = a_1^2 + a_2^2 + \ldots + a_n^2\) and identifies the corresponding eigenvector as \(x = (a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_n)^T\).
  • A later reply introduces the idea that if \(y\) is a nonzero vector orthogonal to \(x\), then \(A^TAy = 0\), indicating that \(y\) is also an eigenvector corresponding to the eigenvalue \(0\).
  • Participants express uncertainty about the completeness of the eigenvalue analysis, particularly regarding the existence of other eigenvalues beyond those identified.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants agree on the identification of one eigenvalue \(\lambda = a_1^2 + a_2^2 + \ldots + a_n^2\) and the corresponding eigenvector. However, there is no consensus on whether additional eigenvalues exist, as the discussion introduces the possibility of \(0\) being another eigenvalue without resolving the complete set of eigenvalues.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not fully explore the implications of the matrix's structure or the conditions under which the eigenvalues are derived, leaving some assumptions and dependencies on definitions unresolved.

Sudharaka
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,558
Reaction score
1
Hi everyone, :)

Here's a question I got stuck. Hope you can shed some light on it. :)

Find all eigenvalues of a linear transformation \(f\) whose matrix in some basis is \(A^{t}.A\) where \(A=(a_1,\cdots, a_n)\).

Of course if we write the matrix of the linear transformation we get,

\[A^{t}.A=\begin{pmatrix}a_1^2 & a_{1}a_2 & \cdots & a_{1}a_{n}\\a_2 a_1 & a_2^2 &\cdots & a_{2}a_{n}\\.&.&\cdots&.\\.&.&\cdots&.\\a_n a_1 & a_{n}a_2 & \cdots & a_{n}^2\end{pmatrix}\]

Now this is a symmetric matrix. So it could be written as \(A^{t}.A=QDQ^T\) where \(Q\) is a orthogonal matrix and \(D\) is a diagonal matrix. If we can do this the diagonal elements of the diagonal matrix gives all the eigenvalues we need. However I have no idea how break \(A^{t}.A\) into \(QDQ^T\). Or does any of you see a different approach to this problem which is much more easier? :)


 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sudharaka said:
Hi everyone, :)

Here's a question I got stuck. Hope you can shed some light on it. :)
Of course if we write the matrix of the linear transformation we get,

\[A^{t}.A=\begin{pmatrix}a_1^2 & a_{1}a_2 & \cdots & a_{1}a_{n}\\a_2 a_1 & a_2^2 &\cdots & a_{2}a_{n}\\.&.&\cdots&.\\.&.&\cdots&.\\a_n a_1 & a_{n}a_2 & \cdots & a_{n}^2\end{pmatrix}\]

Now this is a symmetric matrix. So it could be written as \(A^{t}.A=QDQ^T\) where \(Q\) is a orthogonal matrix and \(D\) is a diagonal matrix. If we can do this the diagonal elements of the diagonal matrix gives all the eigenvalues we need. However I have no idea how break \(A^{t}.A\) into \(QDQ^T\). Or does any of you see a different approach to this problem which is much more easier? :)




I think I found a way to solve this problem. The method seems quite obvious but if you see any mistakes in it please let me know. :)

So we know that,

\[(A^{T}A)x=\lambda x\]

where \(x\) is the eigenvector corresponding to \(\lambda\). We simply multiply both sides by \(A\) and use the associative property of matrix multiplication.

\[A(A^{T}A)x=\lambda (Ax)\]

\[(AA^{T})(Ax)=\lambda (Ax)\]

\[(a_1^2+a^2_2+\cdots+a_n^2)(Ax)=\lambda (Ax)\]

Therefore,

\[\lambda = a_1^2+a^2_2+\cdots+a_n^2\]

And that's it! Yay, we found the eigenvalue. :p
 
You have found one eigenvalue, namely $\lambda = a_1^2+a_2^2+\ldots+a_n^2$. In fact, if $x = (a_1,a_2,\ldots,a_n)^T$ then $x$ is an eigenvector, with eigenvalue $\lambda$.

Now suppose that $y = (b_1,b_2,\ldots,b_n)^T$ is a (nonzero) vector orthogonal to $x$, $x.y = 0$. If you form the product $A^TAy$, you will find that its $i$th coordinate is $a_i(x.y) = 0$ for $i=1,2,\ldots,n$, and so $A^TAy = 0$. That shows that $y$ is an eigenvector of $A^TA$, corresponding to the eigenvalue $0$. In other words, all the other eigenvalues of $A^TA$ are $0$.
 
Opalg said:
You have found one eigenvalue, namely $\lambda = a_1^2+a_2^2+\ldots+a_n^2$. In fact, if $x = (a_1,a_2,\ldots,a_n)^T$ then $x$ is an eigenvector, with eigenvalue $\lambda$.

Now suppose that $y = (b_1,b_2,\ldots,b_n)^T$ is a (nonzero) vector orthogonal to $x$, $x.y = 0$. If you form the product $A^TAy$, you will find that its $i$th coordinate is $a_i(x.y) = 0$ for $i=1,2,\ldots,n$, and so $A^TAy = 0$. That shows that $y$ is an eigenvector of $A^TA$, corresponding to the eigenvalue $0$. In other words, all the other eigenvalues of $A^TA$ are $0$.

Wow, thanks very much for completing my answer. It never occurred me that 0 could be a possibility of an eigenvalue. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
4K