Undergrad Einstein & Lambda: 1917 Static Model Review

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chronos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Einstein Lambda
Click For Summary
Einstein's 1917 Static Model of the Universe, discussed in the paper, reveals his motivations for introducing the cosmological constant, lambda, into his field equations. The paper highlights the controversy surrounding lambda, both at its inception and after Einstein's later rejection of it. Although the concept had existed for decades, Einstein articulated it in a compelling manner, addressing the instability of a static universe against gravitational collapse. His ambivalence towards lambda persisted throughout his life, complicating his views on the universe's nature. Ultimately, the discussion raises questions about the viability of theories opposing the expanding universe in light of observational evidence.
Chronos
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
11,420
Reaction score
751
This paper; https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.07261, Einstein's 1917 Static Model of the Universe: A Centennial Review, offers an informative insight into the mind of Einstein and, to large extent, his motivation for adding the cosmological constant to his field equations. Interestingly, both the introduction of lambda, and his subsequent repudiation, inspired controversy among from his peers. Though the basic idea had been around for decades, it had never been expressed quite so eloquently. The paper goes on to address the issues he was attempting to resolve with lambda. The jury is still out on whether or not it was justified. It is clear, however, Einstein was deeply ambivalent towards lambda for the remainder of his life. While lambda may have enabled Einstein to predict the expansion of the universe, it mainly served to resurrect an issue well known and argued since the time of Newton - that a static universe was unstable against gravitational collapse.
 
  • Like
Likes Drakkith and DrClaude
Space news on Phys.org
I tend to sympathize with Einstein's dislike for a non-static universe. It really complicates an otherwise orderly and sensible universe. Are there any viable theories still standing against observational evidence of an expanding universe without being bent into a pretzel?
 
Chronos said:
Are there any viable theories still standing against observational evidence of an expanding universe without being bent into a pretzel?

Not that I'm aware of.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
124
Views
17K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
127
Views
27K