Einstein's relativity proves caloric theory?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hobold
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativity Theory
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Einstein's theory of relativity does not support caloric theory, which is considered obsolete. Caloric theory posits a fluid that transfers heat and contains mass, while relativity asserts that energy loss does not equate to mass loss, as demonstrated by photons. The connection between thermodynamic heat and kinetic energy is acknowledged, but the limitations of caloric theory are highlighted, particularly in relation to Joule's findings on the mechanical equivalent of heat. Ultimately, relativity provides a comprehensive framework that addresses the shortcomings of caloric theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's theory of relativity
  • Familiarity with caloric theory and its historical context
  • Knowledge of thermodynamics and kinetic energy
  • Awareness of Joule's mechanical equivalent of heat
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Einstein's theory of relativity on modern physics
  • Study the historical development and eventual decline of caloric theory
  • Explore the principles of thermodynamics, focusing on heat transfer and energy conversion
  • Investigate Joule's experiments and their impact on the understanding of heat and energy
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, historians of science, and anyone interested in the evolution of thermodynamic theories and their implications in modern science.

Hobold
Messages
82
Reaction score
1
I am most certainly not right, though I'd like an explanation why my interpretation is wrong.

Einstein's theory of relativity states that anybody that looses energy also looses mass. Considering caloric theory states there is a fluid within every body that contains mass and transfers heat from one body to another, why wouldn't the unmeasureably small mass lost/gained in a heat transfer process be the caloric scientists used to talk about? Or better yet, wouldn't Einstein's relativity be a generalization of caloric theory?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Einstein's theory of relativity states that anybody that looses energy also looses mass. Considering caloric theory states there is a fluid

Intresting correlation but relativity doesn't say that and caloric theory is obsolete:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caloric_theory

For example, when a photon loses energy it does not "lose mass", nor speed for that matter. And two adjacent masses have less potential energy than two widely spaced masses...but have not "lost mass".

Other than the fact that thermodynamic heat can change the kinetic energy of matter and energy also has gravitational effects (with mass
and pressure) I don't know of much connection between relativity and heat.
 
Last edited:
There is no actual proving or disproving involved here but you have made an interesting 'connection' between an ancient and a very modern concept.

The temperature of a substance is certainly connected with the kinetic energy of its particles. There is a bit of a snag with trying to make to two ideas totally parallel, though. When you add energy to cause a change of state or internal Potential Energy, the caloric ideas break down a bit, I think - as they did at the time. Joule demonstrated how the caloric theory didn't account for the effects of friction etc. and brought in the idea of 'the mechanical equivalent of heat'. Relativity, of course, accounts for all this and ties up the loose ends which which caloric didn't explain.

It's good when someone brings up something like this, though. It shows that you've been thinking. :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K