Ejected out from an accelerating spaceship

AI Thread Summary
Scaramanga is ejected from an accelerating helicopter at a speed determined by the helicopter's acceleration. The calculations initially suggested an acceleration of 2.54 m/s² and a height of 11.43 m, but further discussion revealed errors in these values. The correct acceleration of the spaceship is 1.76 m/s², leading to a revised ejection height of 7.92 m. The confusion stemmed from the assumption that Scaramanga was at rest relative to the ground upon ejection, rather than relative to the helicopter. This highlights a common misunderstanding in physics problems involving relative motion.
brotherbobby
Messages
749
Reaction score
169
Homework Statement
Bond and Scaramanga get into a helicopter which begins to accelerate upward at ##a\;\text{m/s}^2## for ##3\;\text{s}## at which point Scaramanga gets thrown out. He bites the dust ##4.92\;\text{s}## after liftoff. (i) What was ##a##? (ii) From what height did Scaramanga get ejected?
Relevant Equations
The kinematic equations for uniform acceleration ##a_0## where all terms have their usual meanings. Just note that ##x(t_0)=x_0## and that ##v(t_0)=v_0##. We can choose ##t_0=0## here.
\begin{align}
&v(t)=v_0+a_0(t-t_0)\\
&x=x_0+v_0(t-t_0)+\dfrac{1}{2}a_0(t-t_0)^2\\
&v^2(x)=v^2_0+2a_0(x-x_0)\\
\end{align}
1706995101569.png
Let me copy and paste the problem as it appeared in the text to the right.




1706995131145.png
I start by drawing the diagram of the problem. Scaramanga (drawn as S) gets thrown out with a speed ##v_0## at time ##t_1=3\;\text{s}## from the helicopter which is accelerating at ##a\;\text{m/s}^2## starting from rest from the ground. After a time of ##t_2=1.92\;\text{s}## from then, S reaches the ground. Using equation ##(2)## above, we can write $$-h=v_0t_2-\frac{1}{2}gt_2^2\qquad\text{(4)}$$where using ##(1)##, ##v_0=at_1## and using ##(2)## again ##h=\frac{1}{2}at_1^2##.
Substituting in ##(4)##,
\begin{align*}
-\frac{1}{2}at_1^2 &= at_1t_2-\frac{1}{2}gt_2^2\\
\Rightarrow \frac{1}{2}gt_2^2 &= at_1t_2+\frac{1}{2}at_1^2\\
\Rightarrow a(t_1t_2+\frac{1}{2}t_1^2) &=\frac{1}{2}gt_2^2\\
\Rightarrow at_1(2t_2+t_1)&=gt_2^2\\
\Rightarrow a &= \dfrac{gt_2^2}{t_1(2t_2+t_1)}\\
\Rightarrow a &= \dfrac{10\times 1.92^2}{3(2\times 1.92+3)}\\
\Rightarrow &\boxed{a=2.54\;\text{m/s}^2}
\end{align*}
The height at which the throwing off took place : ##h = \frac{1}{2}at_1^2=\frac{1}{2}\times 2.54\times 3^2=\boxed{11.43\;\text{m}}##

1706995168209.png
Doubt : The problems don't match with those in the text that I copy and paste to the right.

Request : I'd like to know where have I gone wrong. Was it in the meaning of the term "liftoff"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
brotherbobby said:
Homework Statement: Bond and Scaramanga get into a helicopter which begins to accelerate upward at ##a\;\text{m/s}^2## for ##3\;\text{s}## at which point Scaramanga gets thrown out. He bites the dust ##4.92\;\text{s}## after liftoff. (i) What was ##a##? (ii) From what height did Scaramanga get ejected?
Relevant Equations: The kinematic equations for uniform acceleration ##a_0## where all terms have their usual meanings. Just note that ##x(t_0)=x_0## and that ##v(t_0)=v_0##. We can choose ##t_0=0## here.
\begin{align}
&v(t)=v_0+a_0(t-t_0)\\
&x=x_0+v_0(t-t_0)+\dfrac{1}{2}a_0(t-t_0)^2\\
&v^2(x)=v^2_0+2a_0(x-x_0)\\
\end{align}

View attachment 339718Let me copy and paste the problem as it appeared in the text to the right.




View attachment 339719I start by drawing the diagram of the problem. Scaramanga (drawn as S) gets thrown out with a speed ##v_0## at time ##t_1=3\;\text{s}## from the helicopter which is accelerating at ##a\;\text{m/s}^2## starting from rest from the ground. After a time of ##t_2=1.92\;\text{s}## from then, S reaches the ground. Using equation ##(2)## above, we can write $$-h=v_0t_2-\frac{1}{2}gt_2^2\qquad\text{(4)}$$where using ##(1)##, ##v_0=at_1## and using ##(2)## again ##h=\frac{1}{2}at_1^2##.
Substituting in ##(4)##,
\begin{align*}
-\frac{1}{2}at_1^2 &= at_1t_2-\frac{1}{2}gt_2^2\\
\Rightarrow \frac{1}{2}gt_2^2 &= at_1t_2+\frac{1}{2}at_1^2\\
\Rightarrow a(t_1t_2+\frac{1}{2}t_1^2) &=\frac{1}{2}gt_2^2\\
\Rightarrow at_1(2t_2+t_1)&=gt_2^2\\
\Rightarrow a &= \dfrac{gt_2^2}{t_1(2t_2+t_1)}\\
\Rightarrow a &= \dfrac{10\times 1.92^2}{3(2\times 1.92+3)}\\
\Rightarrow &\boxed{a=2.54\;\text{m/s}^2}
\end{align*}
The height at which the throwing off took place : ##h = \frac{1}{2}at_1^2=\frac{1}{2}\times 2.54\times 3^2=\boxed{11.43\;\text{m}}##

View attachment 339720Doubt : The problems don't match with those in the text that I copy and paste to the right.

Request : I'd like to know where have I gone wrong. Was it in the meaning of the term "liftoff"?
Your interpretation seems correct to me.
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK, MatinSAR and TSny
@brotherbobby : The answers given in the text appear to come from assuming that S has zero velocity relative to the ground just after being thrown out of the helicopter. We don't have information about how S was thrown out. But, your assumption that S has zero velocity relative to the helicopter seems more reasonable. I agree with your answers.
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR and erobz
Is this yet another question concocted by someone who doesn't actually understand physics?
 
PeroK said:
Is this yet another question concocted by someone who doesn't actually understand physics?
The flaw in the supposed answer has been discussed here. After solving this problem, I agree with EulerJr's numerical answer of 1.76 m/s2 in the reddit.com link and disagree with @brotherbobby's answer of 2.54 m/s2.
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK and TSny
kuruman said:
The flaw in the supposed answer has been discussed here. After solving this problem, I agree with EulerJr's numerical answer of 1.76 m/s2 in the reddit.com link and disagree with @brotherbobby's answer of 2.54 m/s2.
Yes, am sorry, I made calculation errors. The acceleration of the spaceship is ##a = 1.76\;\rm{m/s^2}## and the height of ejection is ##\dfrac{1}{2}\times 1.76\times 3^2 = \rm{7.92\; m}##.

The crucial point of the exercise was the author's mistake. He assumed that an object thrown out of a moving vehicle is at rest relative to ground and not at rest relative to the vehicle.
 

Attachments

  • 1707152566743.png
    1707152566743.png
    6.6 KB · Views: 81
  • Like
Likes TSny, kuruman and erobz
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top