MHB Elasticity of Demand problem help

  • Thread starter Thread starter hallie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elasticity
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the elasticity of demand using the price-demand equation x=f(p)=20,000-550p. The user struggles with simplifying the elasticity formula E(p)=pf'(p)/f(p) and seeks clarification on reaching the final answer E(p)=11p/(400-11p). Another participant explains that dividing both the numerator and denominator by -50 simplifies the equation while reducing the number of negative signs. The conversation emphasizes the preference for a cleaner mathematical expression and concludes with appreciation for the explanation provided.
hallie
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi, I know this may seem like a dumb question, but I just can't seem to get by one part of each elasticity of demand problem I come across. For example:

Use the​ price-demand equation below to find​ E(p), the elasticity of demand.
x=f(p)=20,000-550p

I know that E(p)=pf'(p)/f(p), so in this problem that would get me E(p)=p(-550)/20,000-550p, but after that, I am unsure of how to divide the equation in order to simplify it.
I know the answer is E(p)=11p-/400-11p, but if anyone could tell me how to divide/simplify the equation in order to get to that answer, I would be extremely grateful.

Thank you!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Okay, it looks like you have derived:

$$E(p)=\frac{-550p}{20000-550p}$$

Now if we divide the numerator and denominator by -50, we obtain:

$$E(p)=\frac{11p}{11p-400}$$

Does this make sense?
 
Where do you get the -50 from?
 
hallie said:
Where do you get the -50 from?

Since there is a minus sign on one of the terms in the denominator and a minus sign on the numerator, if we divide by a negative number, then we will only have 1 minus sign in the denominator. I prefer the form:

$$\frac{a}{b-c}$$

over:

$$\frac{-a}{c-b}$$

Even though they are equivalent, I like fewer negatives. Then if we look at 550 and 20000, we see that 50 is the GCD, so dividing each term by -50 will result in the simplest terms in the form with fewer negative signs. :)
 
MarkFL said:
Since there is a minus sign on one of the terms in the denominator and a minus sign on the numerator, if we divide by a negative number, then we will only have 1 minus sign in the denominator. I prefer the form:

$$\frac{a}{b-c}$$

over:

$$\frac{-a}{c-b}$$

Even though they are equivalent, I like fewer negatives. Then if we look at 550 and 20000, we see that 50 is the GCD, so dividing each term by -50 will result in the simplest terms in the form with fewer negative signs. :)

Perfect! Thank you so much for this explanation! :)
 
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
16K
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K