Electrodynamics of Dielectrics: 4D to 3D

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on the four-dimensional generalization of the electromagnetic equations involving four-tensors and four-vectors in electrodynamics, specifically the relationship between magnetic field $\vec{B}$ and magnetic field intensity $\vec{H}$. The user is attempting to derive the equation $$\vec{B} + \vec{E} \times \vec{v}/c = \mu (\vec{H} + \vec{D} \times \vec{v} / c)$$ using the antisymmetric properties of the tensors $F_{\mu \nu}$ and $H_{\mu \nu}$. The discussion highlights the complexity of handling all 64 combinations of indices and seeks a more efficient method to simplify the derivation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of four-dimensional tensor notation
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic field equations in CGS units
  • Knowledge of antisymmetric tensors
  • Basic concepts of special relativity, particularly Lorentz transformations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of antisymmetric tensors in electrodynamics
  • Study the derivation of electromagnetic equations in four-dimensional spacetime
  • Explore simplification techniques for tensor calculations
  • Learn about the implications of four-vector notation in classical physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students studying advanced electromagnetism and special relativity, particularly those interested in the mathematical formulation of electrodynamics.

AndrejR
Messages
1
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
I'm trying to go from 4D to 3D notation easily, instead of writing out all the elements.
Hi, so the four-dimensional generalization of
$$\vec{B}=\mu\vec{H}$$
is
$$F_{\lambda \mu}u_{\nu} + F_{\mu \nu}u_{\lambda} + F_{\nu \lambda}u_{\mu} = \mu (H_{\lambda \mu}u_{\nu} + H_{\mu \nu}u_{\lambda} + H_{\nu \lambda}u_{\mu})$$

From these four-tensors and four-vector I should be able to derive equation

$$\vec{B} + \vec{E} \times \vec{v}/c = \mu (\vec{H} + \vec{D} \times \vec{v} / c) $$

which I am, but only by writing out all the 64 elements (combinations of lambda = 0, 1, 2, 3 nu = 0, 1, 2, 3 mu = 0, 1, 2, 3).

Surely there must be a simpler way? Perhaps I can somehow take advantage of the fact that F is antisymmetric? Or is there some trick in this 4D notation which I am missing?
Btw. it's all in CGS and those four-tensors and four-vector are

$$
F_{\mu \nu} =
\begin{pmatrix}
0&E_x&E_y&E_z\\
-E_x&0&-B_z&B_y\\
-E_y&B_z&0&-B_x\\
-E_z&-B_y&B_x&0\\
\end{pmatrix}
$$

$$
H_{\mu \nu} =
\begin{pmatrix}
0&D_x&D_y&D_z\\
-D_x&0&-H_z&H_y\\
-D_y&H_z&0&-H_x\\
-D_z&-H_y&H_x&0\\
\end{pmatrix}
$$

$$
u_{\mu} =
\begin{pmatrix}
\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}}\\
\frac{-\vec{v}}{c\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}}
\end{pmatrix}
$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale and Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K