Electroweak Breaking MSSM- D-term pot. question

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ChrisVer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electroweak
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 2K views
Science Advisor
Messages
3,372
Reaction score
465
Looking at the attachment, I see that the scalar potential coming from the D-term of the Higgs sector is given as shown in (8.14b).
However shouldn't there also be a field ξ as in Fayet-Iliopoulos model?
[itex]V_{D}= \frac{1}{2} |ξ+ g \phi^{*} \phi|^{2}[/itex]
Is there a reason I don't see, that allows us to set ξ=0?
Also here:
http://staff.science.uva.nl/~jdeboer/education/projects/projects/mscthesis.pdf
page 34 as you scroll down, equation 1.4.12 (or even under 1.4.10) the D term for the potential are given differently...

Also a second question, the chiral Higgs scalar sfields as denoted in the attachment... what happens to the [itex]V[/itex] vector sfield in [itex]S^{\dagger} e^{V} S=S^{\dagger} e^{\frac{1}{2}g_{2}T^{a}V^{a}-2i \theta \sigma^{\mu} \bar{\theta} \partial_{\mu}} S |_{Left}[/itex]?

(the attachment is from Howard Baer, Xerxes Tata- Weak scale Supersymmetry (2006), chapter 8.2)
 

Attachments

  • LatEx.jpg
    LatEx.jpg
    40.7 KB · Views: 505
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org