MHB Elementary Number Theory proof

AI Thread Summary
To prove that if \( k \) divides integers \( a \) and \( b \), then \( k \) divides \( as + bt \) for any integers \( s \) and \( t \), start by expressing \( a \) and \( b \) as \( a = km \) and \( b = kn \) for some integers \( m \) and \( n \). Substituting these into the expression \( as + bt \) gives \( (km)s + (kn)t = k(ms + nt) \). Since \( ms + nt \) is an integer, it follows that \( k \) divides \( as + bt \). This confirms the proof is valid, and the approach should focus on the generality of \( s \) and \( t \) rather than specific values.
cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
Dear Everyone,

Here is the question:

"Prove that if $k$ divides the integers $a$ and $b$, then $k$ divides $as+bt$ for every pair of integers $s$ and $t$ for every pair of integers."

The attempted work:

Suppose $k$ divides $a$ and $k$ divides $b$, where $a,b\in\mathbb{Z}$. Then, $a=kt$ and $b=ks$, where $s,t\in\mathbb{Z}$ (Here is where I am stuck).

Do I solve for $k$?

If I do solve for $k$, then it yields the
$k=\frac{a}{t}$. Then, $b=\frac{as}{t}$. So $bt-as=0$. Then $0$ divides $bt-as$.

So is it right to the proof this way?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Cbarker1 said:
Dear Everyone,

Here is the question:

"Prove that if $k$ divides the integers $a$ and $b$, then $k$ divides $as+bt$ for every pair of integers $s$ and $t$ for every pair of integers."

The attempted work:

Suppose $k$ divides $a$ and $k$ divides $b$, where $a,b\in\mathbb{Z}$. Then, $a=kt$ and $b=ks$, where $s,t\in\mathbb{Z}$ (Here is where I am stuck).

Do I solve for $k$?

If I do solve for $k$, then it yields the
$k=\frac{a}{t}$. Then, $b=\frac{as}{t}$. So $bt-as=0$. Then $0$ divides $bt-as$.

So is it right to the proof this way?
Hi Cbarker1,

$s$ and $t$ are arbitrary integers in the question, you should not use them as you do in the proof, where they are fixed integers that depend on $a$, $b$, and $k$.

You can say that there are integers $m$ and $n$ such that $a=km$ and $b=kn$. Now, you have:
$$
as+bt = (km)s + (kn)t = k(ms+nt)
$$
As $ms+nt$ is an integer, this shows that $k$ divides $as+bt$.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top