Undergrad (Elementary number theory) Understanding congruence and modulus

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the application of congruence and modulus in elementary number theory, specifically the transitivity property and the congruence addition and multiplication theorems. Participants clarify that if \( a_1 \equiv a_2 \; (mod\; m) \) and \( b_1 \equiv b_2 \; (mod\; m) \), then \( a_1b_1 \equiv a_2b_2 \; (mod\; m) \). The example provided illustrates that \( 9 \equiv 2 \; (mod\; 7) \) and \( 3^3 \equiv -1 \; (mod\; 7) \) can be used interchangeably in calculations. The discussion emphasizes understanding how to apply these congruence properties in modular arithmetic.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic modular arithmetic
  • Familiarity with congruence relations
  • Knowledge of the transitivity property in mathematics
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of modular arithmetic in detail
  • Learn about the Chinese Remainder Theorem
  • Explore applications of congruence in cryptography
  • Investigate advanced topics in number theory, such as Diophantine equations
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, educators teaching number theory, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of modular arithmetic and congruences.

Leo Liu
Messages
353
Reaction score
156
TL;DR
N/A
298650c66ca%2FScreen_Shot_2021-11-15_at_6.35.43_PM.png


In this question, how does the step marked with 1 become the step marked with 2? I can see that the transitivity property of congruence is used, but I don’t know what exactly is going on here. Can someone please explain? Also at which step is Congruence Add and Multiply used?

Thanks.

Preposition used:
Screen Shot 2021-11-15 at 9.01.09 PM.png
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Isn’t 9 mod 7 the value 2?

Similarly for 3^3 is 27 which is one less than 28.

what rule would they be using to do this?
 
jedishrfu said:
Isn’t 9 mod 7 the value 2?

Similarly for 3^3 is 27 which is one less than 28.
Yes. But I just don't understand how the theorem is applied here.
 
The theorem says the modulo N of a sum or product of a list of numbers is the same as the sum or product of the modulos of those numbers, right?
 
  • Like
Likes Leo Liu
jedishrfu said:
The theorem says the modulo N of a sum or product of a list of numbers is the same as the sum or product of the modulos of those numbers, right?
Right. But I am afraid that I still cannot see why as the congruence equations are not in the same form as the preposition.
 
Leo Liu said:
Right. But I am afraid that I still cannot see why as the congruence equations are not in the same form as the preposition.
What does that mean?

We have ##9 = 2 + 7##. Therefore ##9 \equiv 2 \ (mod \ 7)##. Therefore we may replace ##9## by ##2## in any equation modulo ##7##. That's the idea.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes Leo Liu
The proposition says that if ##a_1\equiv a_2 \; (mod\; m)## and ##b_1\equiv b_2 \; (mod\; m)##, then you have ##a_1b_1\equiv a_2b_2 \; (mod\; m)##.

In the example it is applied to ##9 \equiv 2 \; (mod\; 7)## and ##3^3 \equiv -1 \; (mod\; 7)##.
 
  • Like
Likes Leo Liu
PeroK said:
What does that mean?

We have ##9 = 2 + 7##. Therefore ##9 \equiv 2 \ (mod \ 7)##. Therefore we may replace ##9## by ##2## in any equation modulo ##7##. That's the idea.
Thanks. You answer helped me understand it intuitively. Yet I still don't know how the congruence add and multiply is applied to this step.
 
martinbn said:
The proposition says that if ##a_1\equiv a_2 \; (mod\; m)## and ##b_1\equiv b_2 \; (mod\; m)##, then you have ##a_1b_1\equiv a_2b_2 \; (mod\; m)##.

In the example it is applied to ##9 \equiv 2 \; (mod\; 7)## and ##3^3 \equiv -1 \; (mod\; 7)##.
This makes sense, but could you explain why this expression still holds when a1 and b1 is followed by (mod m)?
 
  • #10
Leo Liu said:
Thanks. You answer helped me understand it intuitively. Yet I still don't know how the congruence add and multiply is applied to this step.
Proposition 3 that you quoted in your OP is a formal way to say you can replace a number by any other number of modular equivalence in products and sums. That's what it means - and Proposition 3 is that idea written out formally.
 
  • Like
Likes Leo Liu

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K