I Energies of bound state for delta function potential

ErwinZumer
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
Hi
Let's consider a potential of the form
1695146975780.png

The Schrodinger equation reads
1695147036236.png

as shown in the book 'Introduction to Quantum mechanis' by D.J. Griffiths, Chaper 2 Section 5, the solution of the equation yields (only for bound state, which means E<0):
1695147197115.png

My question:
if i have one particle and i apply this potential on it, how does it take one value of energy?
another question is, if i have one paricle with some energy, E, before applying this potential, does the energy of the particle will change?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ErwinZumer said:
Hi
Let's consider a potential of the form
View attachment 332220
The Schrodinger equation reads
View attachment 332222
as shown in the book 'Introduction to Quantum mechanis' by D.J. Griffiths, Chaper 2 Section 5, the solution of the equation yields (only for bound state, which means E<0):
View attachment 332223
My question:
if i have one particle and i apply this potential on it, how does it take one value of energy?
another question is, if i have one paricle with some energy, E, before applying this potential, does the energy of the particle will change?
There are parallels, of course with the hydrogen atom, where an electron may settle into a bound state around the nucleus by emitting a photon that carries away the excess energy. Does this happen for the delta function potential? Good question.

The physical significance of the delta potential is probably in the scattering states and the transmission and reflection coefficients.

There's more here to get you started if you want to investigate further:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delta_potential
 
That delta function potential is like the limit of a finite square well, ##V(x) = -V_0## when ##|x|<L/2## and ##V(x) = 0## when ##|x|\geq L/2##, if you start making it more narrow by decreasing ##L## and increasing ##V_0## at the same time so that the product ##V_0 L## stays at constant value ##\alpha##.

It's probably difficult to explain in a pictorial way why this system has exactly one bound state in the limit where ##L## is very close to ##0## and ##V_0## is a very large number.

A more difficult problem would be to find out how much more quickly you would have to increase well depth ##V_0## compared to the rate of ##L## decrease so that after some minimum value of ##V_0## it would have exactly two bound states. But it's impossible to define a generalized function similar to ##\delta (x)## that would describe the high-##V_0## limit of this situation.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top