Energy conservation and friction

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of energy conservation in relation to friction, particularly focusing on how the mass of an object affects its initial speed and the role of the coefficient of friction. Participants explore the implications of mass on kinetic energy and frictional forces, as well as the definitions and relationships involved in these concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the initial speed of an object would not change with greater mass, suggesting that a higher mass would lead to a greater coefficient of static friction.
  • Another participant points out that while friction increases with mass, so does kinetic energy, leading to a cancellation effect that results in speed being independent of mass.
  • A later reply clarifies that the coefficient of kinetic friction is determined by the surfaces in contact and is not affected by the mass of the object.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of the coefficient of friction, with one participant asserting that it is simply the ratio of the normal force to the friction force, while another emphasizes that this ratio may not depend on the normal force.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between mass, friction, and speed. While some agree on the independence of speed from mass due to the cancellation of forces, others raise questions about the role of the coefficient of friction and its dependence on various factors. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these relationships.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight potential misunderstandings regarding the coefficient of friction and its dependence on the normal force and speed, indicating a need for clarity on these definitions and relationships.

otownsend
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I just started learning physics at university and so I'm looking for help on a simple energy conservation problem. On the bottom right-hand of the image I attached below, you should see that it asks whether the initial speed would increase or decrease if the object was of a greater mass... why would the speed not change? In the calculations for initial speed, the co-efficient of static friction is included which varies depending on what surfaces are in contact with each other. I would therefore believe that the initial speed of the larger mass object would be greater, since the co-efficient would also be greater. Can someone please clarify this for me?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20181112_104542.jpg
    IMG_20181112_104542.jpg
    83.5 KB · Views: 379
Physics news on Phys.org
otownsend said:
Hi,

I just started learning physics at university and so I'm looking for help on a simple energy conservation problem. On the bottom right-hand of the image I attached below, you should see that it asks whether the initial speed would increase or decrease if the object was of a greater mass... why would the speed not change? In the calculations for initial speed, the co-efficient of static friction is included which varies depending on what surfaces are in contact with each other. I would therefore believe that the initial speed of the larger mass object would be greater, since the co-efficient would also be greater. Can someone please clarify this for me?
Look at the equation just above "Solve and evaluate." You will notice that the mass enters on both sides of the equation. So yes, the friction will be greater with the greater mass of the vehicle, but so will its kinetic energy. The two cancel out and the result is independent of the mass of the object.
 
DrClaude said:
Look at the equation just above "Solve and evaluate." You will notice that the mass enters on both sides of the equation. So yes, the friction will be greater with the greater mass of the vehicle, but so will its kinetic energy. The two cancel out and the result is independent of the mass of the object.
Oh I think I understand what you mean!

The co-efficient of kinetic friction is just determined by the contacting surfaces (rubber and concrete in this example) and so the mass of the object does not affect this value.

I believe I was under the impression that the co-efficient of kinetic friction was determined by the normal force of the object (which indirectly means the mass of the object), which actually is not the case. The coefficient is merely the relationship between contacting surfaces of the same type and is discovered when comparing the ratio between the normal force and the friction force ... right?
 
otownsend said:
The coefficient is merely the relationship between contacting surfaces of the same type...
They don't have to be of the same type.

otownsend said:
... and is discovered when comparing the ratio between the normal force and the friction force ... right?
It's not "discovered when comparing the ratio", it simply is the ratio.
 
otownsend said:
The coefficient [...] is the ratio between the normal force and the friction force ... right?

Yes, but note that the ratio may or may not depend on the normal force. The usual approach is to adopt the approximation that the ratio is independent of the normal force and also independent of the speed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K