B Energy loss of a photon

Click For Summary
Photons do not lose energy as they travel through a vacuum, and this is not due to the concept of time. General relativity indicates that energy creates a gravitational field that propagates at the speed of light, but this does not imply that photons lose energy over distance. The discussion is based on a misunderstanding of these principles. Therefore, the thread has been closed due to the incorrect premise presented.
kymner
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Quick question about energy loss of a photon due to its own gravitational field.
I've been told that a photon doesn't lose energy as it travels through a vacuum because it doesn't experience time. However, general relativity states that any energy creates a gravitational field that travels away from the energy at the speed of light. Doesn't this imply that a photon once created should immediately create a gravitational wave that very slightly decreases it's energy changing its gravitational field and creating more gravitational waves causing it to very lose all of its energy over astronomically large distances? Since the gravitational field expands out to infinity shouldn't the energy lost be perpetual so that it continues losing energy forever until it ceases to exist? Wouldn't this explain the apparent expansion of the universe without actually requiring expansion?
 
  • Skeptical
Likes PeroK
Physics news on Phys.org
kymner said:
I've been told that a photon doesn't lose energy as it travels through a vacuum because it doesn't experience time…. general relativity states that any energy creates a gravitational field that travels away from the energy at the speed of light.
Whoever told you these things, either they’re wrong or you misunderstood them.
(It is true that light doesn’t lose energy as it travels through a vacuum, but that isn’t because it “doesn’t experience time”).

As this thread is based on a mistaken premise, it is closed.
 
Moderator's note: Spin-off from another thread due to topic change. In the second link referenced, there is a claim about a physical interpretation of frame field. Consider a family of observers whose worldlines fill a region of spacetime. Each of them carries a clock and a set of mutually orthogonal rulers. Each observer points in the (timelike) direction defined by its worldline's tangent at any given event along it. What about the rulers each of them carries ? My interpretation: each...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K