Do Moving Masses Slow Down Due to Gravitational Waves?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of whether moving masses slow down due to the production of gravitational waves. It explores the theoretical implications of gravitational radiation, its effects on energy loss for moving masses, and the conditions under which gravitational waves are emitted.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that all moving masses produce gravitational waves due to the curvature of space, but the effects are likely negligible.
  • Others argue that while gravitational waves are technically produced, their impact is so weak that it may be considered insignificant in practical terms.
  • A participant notes that objects in free fall do not experience meaningful acceleration, and gravitational radiation is associated with changing quadrupole moments of stress-energy.
  • There is a suggestion that any pair of objects should emit gravitational radiation unless they are at rest relative to each other, which may lead to a relative slowdown, though this is dependent on the chosen coordinate system.
  • One participant questions whether "speed up" can have a coordinate-independent meaning, particularly in the context of gravitational effects and non-inertial frames.
  • A later reply raises the concern that extending the argument to all objects is risky, as general relativity may not accurately describe gravity when quantum effects are significant, potentially affecting gravitational wave emission.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the production of gravitational waves by moving masses and the implications for energy loss. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus on the extent or significance of these effects.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in their understanding of the physics involved, particularly regarding the role of quantum effects in gravitational wave production. There are also unresolved questions about the implications of coordinate systems on the interpretation of acceleration and motion.

Cato
Messages
56
Reaction score
10
TL;DR
Gravitational waves are produced by accelerating masses. Since all space is curved -- more curved near large masses stars, less curved in intergalactic space -- all moving masses are being accelerated to some degree. Do all moving masses therefore produce gravitational waves? If they do, will all moving masses lose energy and slow down?
Gravitational waves are produced by accelerating masses. Since all space is curved -- more curved near large masses stars, less curved in intergalactic space -- all moving masses are being accelerated to some degree. Do all moving masses therefore produce gravitational waves? If they do, will all moving masses lose energy and slow down?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Technically, yes, gravity waves are produced but they are so weak in the kind of situation that you describe that their effect is probably something like a rounding error in the 15th decimal place.
 
Last edited:
Objects in free fall aren't accelerating in any meaningful sense. The source of gravitational radiation is stress-energy with a changing quadropole moment.

That does mean that any pair of objects ought to emit gravitational radiation unless they are at rest with respect to one another (I think - there might be exceptions). And that does mean that they'll slow down with respect to one another, but that may or may not mean slow down with respect to whatever coordinate system you are using.

Back-of-the-envelope, the kinetic energy of Earth in its orbit is 1031J. The power output from gravitational radiation is around 100W, if memory serves. So I think that this effect is rather weaker even than @phinds says - even for a system as massive as our planet.

Finally, extending this argument to "every object" is risky. We strongly suspect that GR is not an accurate description of gravity when quantum effects are important for its source. So gravitational radiation may or may not be emitted by very small objects.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phinds
Ibix said:
That does mean that any pair of objects ought to emit gravitational radiation unless they are at rest with respect to one another (I think - there might be exceptions). And that does mean that they'll slow down with respect to one another, but that may or may not mean slow down with respect to whatever coordinate system you are using.
Looking at the the merger of two compact objects I think they speed up independent of the chosen coordinate system. Or do you think of non-inertial frames here?
 
Last edited:
timmdeeg said:
speed up independent of the chosen coordinate system.
Can “speed up” ever have a coordinate-independent meaning? “Experiences proper acceleration” has a coordinate-independent meaning and in an inertial frame does imply what most people would mean by “speed up”... but we’re talking gravitational effects here, so are considering regions of spacetime that aren’t properly described by any inertial frame.
 
I don't know this kind of physics enough to discuss the details. "Finally, extending this argument to "every object" is risky. We strongly suspect that GR is not an accurate description of gravity when quantum effects are important for its source. So gravitational radiation may or may not be emitted by very small objects." So perhaps objects where quantum effects are important don't produce gravitational waves. Thanks for all your answers.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K