Energy of e.m waves in a cavity

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Soph_the_Oaf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cavity Energy Waves
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the energy density of electromagnetic (e.m.) modes in a cavity, specifically addressing the formula for energy in the range ω to ω+dω, expressed as U(ω)dω = h-bar ω G(ω)dω. The confusion arises regarding the use of h-bar ω instead of ε = ( + 1) h-bar ω, which represents the actual energy per mode. The conversation clarifies that the mean number of quanta per mode is used to calculate total energy in a given frequency range, leading to the derivation of the total number of photons and the density of states for bosons.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic wave theory
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics concepts, particularly photon statistics
  • Knowledge of statistical mechanics, especially Bose-Einstein distribution
  • Basic calculus for integration and summation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Bose-Einstein distribution for bosons
  • Learn about the density of states in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the implications of Planck's law on blackbody radiation
  • Investigate applications of e.m. wave energy density in thermodynamics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers in thermodynamics who are exploring the behavior of electromagnetic waves in confined spaces.

Soph_the_Oaf
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Hi there people

I'm going through some old notes and have become a bit confused... I'm looking at the energy density of e.m modes in a cavity

I have that

(energy in the range ω to ω+dω) = (mean number of quanta per mode) x (energy per quanta) x (number of e.m modes in the range ω to ω+dω)

which is

U(ω)dω = <n(ω)> h-bar ω G(ω)dω

Why do we use <n(ω)> h-bar ω and not ε = { <n(ω)> + 1) h-bar ω

because ε is the actual energy per mode and we are looking at the total energy in a given range??

I guess maybe I'm getting confused with a definition somewhere along the way... any insight would be greatly appreciated

Cheers
Soph
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm still not sure I see your reasoning for wanting to change the form, can you clarify your question.

I'll spit something out that has to do with energy density for the photon gas in hopes that it helps you out/ is right.

The approximate total number of photons is given by
[tex] \langle N \rangle =\sum_{\omega} \langle n_\omega \rangle[/tex]
with [itex]\langle n \rangle[/itex] as the approximate number of photons in a given frequency mode. Now if we take a continuum limit for the frequencies we write
[tex] \langle N \rangle =\int_{0}^{\infty} g(\omega) \langle n \rangle d\omega[/tex]
Now for bosons,
[tex] \langle n \rangle =(\exp(\hbar \omega /kT)-1)^{-1}[/tex]
For the density of states [itex]g(\omega)[/itex]
[tex] g(\omega)d\omega=\frac{d^{3}p\, d^{3}x}{\hbar^3}=\frac{V}{\hbar^3}d^3 p[/tex]
Now expressing the momentum in terms of frequency we have
[tex] p=\frac{\hbar \omega}{c}\implies dp=\frac{\hbar}{c} d\omega[/tex]
Now
[tex] d^3 p=4\pi p^2 dp=4\pi \left(\frac{\hbar}{c}\right)^3 \omega^2 d\omega \implies g(\omega)d\omega=4\pi \frac{V}{\hbar^3}\left(\frac{\hbar}{c}\right)^3 \omega^2 d\omega[/tex]
Now we have to remember to throw in the number 2 cause our math won't do the counting for us, there are two transverse modes to account for.
[tex] g(\omega)d\omega=\frac{8 \pi V}{c^3}\omega^2 d\omega[/tex]
then
[tex] \langle N \rangle=\frac{8 \pi V}{c^3}\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{\omega^2 d\omega}{e^{\frac{\hbar\omega}{kT}}-1}[/tex]
to get [itex]\langle E \rangle[/itex] we just need to calculate
[tex] \langle E \rangle =\sum_{\omega}\langle n_\omega \rangle \epsilon_\omega[/tex]
with [itex]\epsilon=\hbar \omega[/itex].

Hope this helps.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K