Energy, power and staying still.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fallen Seraph
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Power
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the power required for an object to hover, specifically focusing on maintaining an upward force equal to the object's weight (mg) without relying on a fixed object for support. Participants explore the implications of different methods of hovering and the associated power requirements.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various methods of hovering, including rockets, balloons, and helicopters, and question the necessity of a minimum power requirement. There is exploration of the relationship between thrust, exhaust velocity, and mass ejection rate in the context of hovering.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering insights into the calculations and assumptions involved in determining power requirements. Some guidance has been provided regarding the relationship between thrust and power, but multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that hovering methods can vary significantly in power requirements, with some methods like balloons potentially requiring no power at all. There is also mention of constraints related to the duration of hovering and the implications of varying exhaust velocities and mass ejection rates.

Fallen Seraph
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I need to calculate the power required for an object to hover. So I need to find the power needed to maintain an upwards force of mg on the object (not using any fixed object, relying on the air for Newton's third law) , and I'd much rather do it without considering the object's method of propulsion..



The Attempt at a Solution



No equations i can find are suitable and the fact that the object won't move leaves me very confused wrt units. I can't see where I'm going to pull Nm/s as a unit out of, but intuitively it requires energy to stay up in the air...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can hover in a rocket, or a balloon or a helicopter. For the first two cases the calculation is straightforward.

For a rocket, the lift is given by the momentum of the expelled matter per second, i.e. rate of change of momentum. If this is equal to mg you'll hover.
 
Indeed, but is there no way to determine the minimum power required, regardless of the method of hovering used?
 
There is no minimum power required. The balloon uses zero. Even the 'helicopter' can use arbitrarily small amounts of power if it is allowed to have arbitrarily large 'rotors'.
 
You have to consider the method of elevation. For instance, hovering in a balloon requires no power.

If you assume your rocket is perfect then the calculation above can be taken as a minimum requirement.
 
Even for the rocket you can't pin down a minimum power without other considerations. You can write the thrust force as v*dm/dt where v is the exhaust velocity and dm/dt is the rate of exhaust mass ejection. Power is (1/2)*v^2*dm/dt. So by making v very small and dm/dt very large you can hover at as low a power as you wish. Of course, you can't do it for very long. This is basically the flight strategy of taking an anvil with you as fuel and then when it's time to hover, dropping it and trying to stand on it.
 
Dick, thanks for clarifying that.

Power is (1/2)*v^2*dm/dt. So by making v very small and dm/dt very large you can hover at as low a power as you wish

I don't see the logic here because there's a constraint that the lift force must be above a certain minimum.
 
Set v*dm/dt=M*g (M is the mass of the rocket - which will start changing but we don't worry about that because we aren't concerned with hovering for any significant period of time). Then v=(M*g)/(dm/dt). So power P is proportional to 1/(dm/dt). Sending v to zero and dm/dt to infinity gives a fixed force for arbitrarily small power (albeit also for arbitrarily small times). PS. I've given this a lot of thought - a biologist buddy used to try to convince me there MUST be a minimum power requirement.
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
36K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K