Entangling Photons: A Brief Overview of Quantum Interference

  • Thread starter Thread starter thenewmans
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photons
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the process of entangling photons, primarily through the technique known as parametric down conversion (PDC). Two types of PDC, Type I and Type II, utilize a non-linear crystal to split a single photon into two entangled "daughter" photons, conserving energy, momentum, and spin. The resulting photons maintain a superposition of states until observed, allowing for polarization correlation. The conversation also clarifies that beam splitters and Young's slits do not produce photon pairs from laser light, as they do not alter the number of photons.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of parametric down conversion (PDC)
  • Knowledge of non-linear optics
  • Familiarity with photon polarization and entanglement
  • Basic principles of quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between Type I and Type II parametric down conversion
  • Explore the role of non-linear crystals in quantum optics
  • Learn about photon polarization measurement techniques
  • Investigate the implications of superposition in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, optical engineers, and anyone interested in the principles of quantum entanglement and photon manipulation.

thenewmans
Messages
168
Reaction score
1
How do you entangle photons?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since no one is answering this...

One of the common technique of getting entangled photos is by using something called a "parametric down conversion". This is where one photon comes in into a crystal and is split into two. The "daughter" photons together obey the conservation properties of the original photon. That property is what is being "entangled" between the two resulting photons.

I thought I had a webpage that gives a rather simple, non-technical explanation of this, but now I can't seem to find it. A google search will give you plenty of technical papers on this topic, though.

Zz.
 
As ZapperZ says, the primary technique is through PDC (parametric down conversion).

There are 2 types of PDC, Type I and Type II. They both rely on a similar underlying principle. A laser input beam of a known wavelength in sent into a non-linear crystal (basically like a small lens) tuned for the input wavelength. Most of the input photons pass through unchanged - and these are ignored. Perhaps one in a million, however, undergoes a metamorphosis. It emerges as 2 photons. Because of conservation of energy, momentum, spin, etc, they are each half the energy and twice the wavelength of the original. Total spin is conserved, so knowing the polarization of one tells you the polarization of the other. They are entangled because they exist as a superposition of states until they are observed. Because these entangled photon pairs emerge off-angle from the original input beam, they can be captured and pulled aside for testing - often using fiber optics and lensing mechanisms to manipulate.

Below is a technical link, unfortunately just about any description of the process gets complicated and confusing very quickly:

http://scotty.quantum.physik.uni-muenchen.de/publ/achtbild.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Does that mean that beam splitters and Youngs Slits DO NOT produce photon pairs with laser light? I have always been unsure about this. Anyone know the correct answer?
 
That is correct. Those experiments do not change the number of photons. If you send one photon into a beam-splitter, you get one photon out. Until that photon interacts with a detector, it is indeterminate, which way the photon went. If the two paths are reunited before the photon is detected, you get interference. If the photon is detected first, you don't get interference.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
600
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
816
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
524
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K