I Equation 16: Missing dt Term Without f(t)?
- Thread starter theycallmevirgo
- Start date
Click For Summary
Equation 16 presents a dt term without an accompanying f(t), raising questions about its validity. The discussion suggests that this could indicate an integral with respect to time, which is common in dynamic systems where the range of integration is often omitted. Participants note that in control systems, the focus is on behavior rather than specific operating points, allowing for simplified notation. There is a debate on whether assuming f(t) equals 1 is valid, as the result may not be neutral when computed. The notation's clarity and context are emphasized as crucial for understanding the equation's implications.
Similar threads
- · Replies 8 ·
- · Replies 3 ·
- · Replies 2 ·
- · Replies 3 ·
- · Replies 4 ·
- · Replies 3 ·
- · Replies 2 ·
- · Replies 1 ·
- · Replies 5 ·