MHB Equation 2: Prove that ##x^2+2x\sqrt x+3x+2\sqrt x+1=0##

  • Thread starter Thread starter solakis1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation x^2 + 2x√x + 3x + 2√x + 1 = 0 has been checked with WolframAlpha, which indicates there are no real solutions. Participants suggest proving this by either using Ferrari's method or graphing the equation. One contributor notes that if √x is not purely imaginary, then x must be complex. The discussion highlights the challenges in finding real solutions to the equation. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards graphing as a preferred method for analysis.
solakis1
Messages
407
Reaction score
0
I checked the following equation with Wolfram\Alpha and the answer was no real solution
How can we prove that?
$x^2+2x\sqrt x+3x+2\sqrt x+1=0$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
solakis said:
I checked the following equation with Wolfram\Alpha and the answer was no real solution
How can we prove that?
$x^2+2x\sqrt x+3x+2\sqrt x+1=0$
You pretty much are stuck with two choices: Ferrari's method or graphing. I'd choose graphing!

-Dan
 
$f(x) = x^2 + 2x\sqrt x + 3x + 2\sqrt x + 1 = (x + \sqrt x + 1)^2$, so if $f(x) = 0$ then $x + \sqrt x + 1 = 0$. That is a quadratic equation for $\sqrt x$, with solutions $\sqrt x = \frac12(-1 \pm i\sqrt3)$. If $\sqrt x$ is non-real then so is $x$. Therefore the equation $f(x) = 0$ has no real solutions.
 
[sp]Well, if $\sqrt{x}$ is not pure imaginary then x is complex, anyway.[/sp]

Nice catch!

-Dan
 
ha, ha so easy solution:mad:
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top