MHB Equation 2: Prove that ##x^2+2x\sqrt x+3x+2\sqrt x+1=0##

  • Thread starter Thread starter solakis1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation x^2 + 2x√x + 3x + 2√x + 1 = 0 has been checked with WolframAlpha, which indicates there are no real solutions. Participants suggest proving this by either using Ferrari's method or graphing the equation. One contributor notes that if √x is not purely imaginary, then x must be complex. The discussion highlights the challenges in finding real solutions to the equation. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards graphing as a preferred method for analysis.
solakis1
Messages
407
Reaction score
0
I checked the following equation with Wolfram\Alpha and the answer was no real solution
How can we prove that?
$x^2+2x\sqrt x+3x+2\sqrt x+1=0$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
solakis said:
I checked the following equation with Wolfram\Alpha and the answer was no real solution
How can we prove that?
$x^2+2x\sqrt x+3x+2\sqrt x+1=0$
You pretty much are stuck with two choices: Ferrari's method or graphing. I'd choose graphing!

-Dan
 
$f(x) = x^2 + 2x\sqrt x + 3x + 2\sqrt x + 1 = (x + \sqrt x + 1)^2$, so if $f(x) = 0$ then $x + \sqrt x + 1 = 0$. That is a quadratic equation for $\sqrt x$, with solutions $\sqrt x = \frac12(-1 \pm i\sqrt3)$. If $\sqrt x$ is non-real then so is $x$. Therefore the equation $f(x) = 0$ has no real solutions.
 
[sp]Well, if $\sqrt{x}$ is not pure imaginary then x is complex, anyway.[/sp]

Nice catch!

-Dan
 
ha, ha so easy solution:mad:
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
989
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top