Equatorial platform: any experiences?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sophiecentaur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Platform
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the use and experiences with equatorial platforms designed for Dobsonian telescopes. Participants explore the mechanics, functionality, and practicality of these platforms, comparing them to traditional mounts and discussing their design features.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants describe the equatorial platform as clever in its geometry, allowing for minimal tilting of the Dobsonian base.
  • Others note that the platform requires a rough polar alignment and operates by tilting to an angle corresponding to the user's latitude.
  • One participant mentions that the platform is actively driven, allowing it to track a star for about an hour with only a slight tilt of around 5 degrees.
  • Concerns are raised about the stability of the Dobsonian on the platform, with one participant suggesting that it may need to be bolted down to avoid falling over due to asymmetrical loads.
  • Another participant compares the equatorial platform to a fork-mounted equatorial mount, suggesting that similar functionality could be achieved with existing equipment using wedge units.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the cost-effectiveness of the platform, particularly for smaller telescopes, suggesting that traditional heavy-duty equatorial mounts may offer better value.
  • Technical details regarding the movement of the platform are discussed, with one participant highlighting the counter-rotating circles that keep the scope locked on target.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of opinions regarding the practicality and value of equatorial platforms for Dobsonian telescopes. While some find the design interesting and potentially useful, others question the cost and effectiveness compared to traditional mounts. No consensus is reached on the overall utility of the platforms.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the existence of two companies producing these platforms, with one having ceased operations, indicating potential market challenges. The discussion includes varying levels of technical understanding and assumptions about the design and functionality of the platforms.

sophiecentaur
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
30,403
Reaction score
7,470
I was trawling the net and came across an equatorial platform that you can put a Dobsonian on. It claims to give you about an hour of tracking and then you have to start again.
The geometry of it looks clever as you never need to be actually tilting the Dobs base by more than a few degrees.
The firm seems to have stopped trading so they clearly weren't selling enough of the platforms (which were fairly expensive). Have any PFstronomers ever used one or owned one?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
sophiecentaur said:
I was trawling the net and came across an equatorial platform that you can put a Dobsonian on. It claims to give you about an hour of tracking and then you have to start again.
The geometry of it looks clever as you never need to be actually tilting the Dobs base by more than a few degrees.

Yes, it's being tilted to an angle that is the same as your latitude and you are doing a rough polar alignment
you dobbo isn't really a dobbo any more, now its a scope on a fork mounted equatorial mount

I could do a similar thing with my fork mounted Al/Az mount scope. There are wedge units available to make it an equatorial mount
here's a www pic of the scope I have on its standard mount ...

ImageGen.ashx?image=%2Fmedia%2F647864%2F11074_CPC_925_GPS_1.jpg
and here's the wedge for it that goes between the base of the mount and the top of the tripod ...

C93664-2T.gif


to give the final result of ...

CELESTRON_CPC_925_HD_WEDGE.png

you could always build your own wedge, not horrifically difficult if your are mechanically minded and have a reasonable workshop or access to oneDave
 
The equatorial platform I refer to is not like that at all . I did consider doing the 'obvious' myself and concluded that the Dob's base would fall over unless it was bolted down and the azimuth bearing would be subjected to an asymmetrical load.
This mount is Actively Driven and follows a star position for about an hour. It tilts by only about 5 degrees. If you look at the link you will see it holding massive Dobs models. It doesn't need to tilt much because it only provides 'correction' and the Dobs bearing operates as it was designed.
[Actually, I gave the wrong link. There seem to be two companies; the US one seems to be functioning still but the UK one has stopped selling them. - too cheap to be making a profit, probably]
 
Last edited:
sophiecentaur said:
This mount is Actively Driven and follows a star position for about an hour. It tilts by only about 5 degrees. If you look at the link you will see it holding massive Dobs models. It doesn't need to tilt much because it only provides 'correction' and the Dobs bearing operates as it was designed.

yeah OK, after looking at this page ...
http://www.equatorialplatforms.com/about.our.platforms.shtml

I see what they are doing ... interesting ideaDave
 
It looks an expensive system and hardly worth it for a 'little' 8" Dobs. An ordinary heavy duty EQ mount would only cost a few hundred quid with Go-to thrown in.
The U.K. Site for those platforms gives a simple description of the principle. The back and front of the platform move in different diameter (counter rotating?) circles to keep the scope locked on target.
Some nifty sums there, I think.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
10K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K