ER=EPR: Leonard Susskind's FAQ on Black Holes & Quantum Complexity

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MTd2
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Leonard Susskind's lecture, "Entanglement is not Enough," presented at KITP in October 2014, addresses the intricate relationship between black holes and quantum complexity. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding entanglement beyond its traditional confines, highlighting quantitative calculations that support Susskind's arguments. Despite the significance of the topic, the post has not received adequate acknowledgment within the academic community. The paper serves as a critical resource for those exploring the complexities of black holes and quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics concepts
  • Understanding of black hole thermodynamics
  • Knowledge of quantum entanglement principles
  • Basic grasp of quantum complexity theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Read Leonard Susskind's paper "Entanglement is not Enough" for in-depth analysis
  • Explore the implications of black hole information paradox
  • Investigate quantum complexity theory and its applications
  • Study the role of entanglement in quantum computing
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum theorists, and researchers interested in the intersection of black holes and quantum complexity will benefit from this discussion.

MTd2
Gold Member
Messages
2,019
Reaction score
25
http://arxiv.org/abs/1411.0690

Entanglement is not Enough
Leonard Susskind
(Submitted on 3 Nov 2014)
This is the written version of a lecture given at KITP in Oct 2014 on Black Holes and quantum complexity. I've included (in boldface) various questions that came up during the lecture and discussions the following day, as well as the quantitative calculations that form the basis of the arguments.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt
Physics news on Phys.org
It is odd that no one has acknowledged this post. I have Susskind's paper on my e-reader as an enlightening soporific and anodyne to the day's controversies. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
9K