Error in Measurements: Confused?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter gladius999
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Errors Measurements
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
gladius999
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
This has been very comfusing. Is the error in taking a reading the smallest or half the smallest division? Say a standard 30cm ruler, you can judge to nearest 0.5mm but since you take 2 readings you need to double the error. But then in titrations using a lab burette you count the titre as half the smallest division? I am very confused here as I cannot decide what to put when a question in an exam asks for the error in the reading.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For measurements of this type, where all the random uncertainties (not errors!) are equal and there are no systemantic uncertainties:
For n measurements:
Add all the measurements and divide by n to get average (don't use rms here).
Divide the uncertainty of one measurement by sqrt(n) to get the uncertainty of the average.
Bob S