Estimate Microbial Number: MPN Method for CFU

  • Thread starter Thread starter frankmp40
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 2K views
frankmp40
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I just want to know should I only use counts in tube3 to estimate microbial number, or the average of tube2 and tube3 estimation.

Thank you!
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    40.7 KB · Views: 509
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you think you should do? Do you have any reason to suspect doing it one way or the other?

Also, when you say averaging the counts do you mean the raw data from each tube? Just to be clear, are you saying you will calculate, for example, (42+4)/2?
 
I mean now I have two estimation:

First one is No. of coliform = 39*dilution factor 1
The second one is No. of coliform = 241*dilution factor 2

Which estimation should I use, or I need to take the average of the two?
 
We can't just offer you an answer, we are here to help you work through your problem and actually learn something.

So I will reiterate my questions above. Do you have any thoughts or reasoning for averaging or not averaging the two measurements? In an ideal world, do you think there should be some relationship between the counts in tube 2 and tube 3?
 
I think the relationship between tube2 and tube3 is a factor of ten.
I would prefer their average as it can minimize errors.
 
I agree with both of the statements you made and would proceed accordingly if I were doing this.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person