Estimating pH Without [H+][A-]: Is There Another Way?

  • Context: Biology 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TytoAlba95
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ph
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around estimating pH in a solution of a weak acid when the concentrations of hydrogen ions ([H+]) and the conjugate base ([A-]) are not provided. Participants explore various methods and equations, including the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation, while addressing the challenges of using incorrect values and assumptions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether all relevant information is being utilized in estimating pH without [H+] and [A-].
  • There are suggestions that a concentrated solution of a weak acid can be approximated easily due to low dissociation.
  • Multiple participants point out errors in the equations presented, particularly regarding the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation and the values used for Ka and concentration (C).
  • One participant proposes starting from first principles to derive the equilibrium expression for the dissociation of the weak acid.
  • There is a discussion about the applicability of different equations for calculating pH, emphasizing the need to choose the correct one based on the situation.
  • A later reply introduces an approximation method for estimating pH based on the concentration of the weak acid and its pKa, suggesting that it is useful for quick calculations.
  • Participants also discuss the implications of citric acid's multiple dissociations and how that affects the estimation of pH.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the correct values and equations to use for estimating pH, with no consensus reached on a single method or approach. Some participants agree on the utility of approximations, while others emphasize the importance of accuracy in calculations.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include unresolved mathematical steps, dependence on the correct identification of variables, and the need for careful consideration of the assumptions made in the calculations.

TytoAlba95
Messages
132
Reaction score
19
Homework Statement
The acidic nature of orange juice is mainly due to citric acid. What would be the pH of 0.1M citric acid, if Ka is 8.4 x 10^-4?
Relevant Equations
pH= pKa + log ([H+][A-]/[HA])
How can we estimate the pH when the [H+][A-] is not provided. Is there some other formula?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you using all the relevant information you have, even if you are not retold it when the question is asked?
Electroneutrality?
It also helps if you know that a concentrated solution of weak acid will be little dissociated which allows an easy approximation though if you have any qualms about that you can still calculate it more accurately as a check.
 
Last edited:
The equation you wrote is wrong (check the part under log) and - assuming you meant Henderson-Hasselbalch equation - not applicable to this question.

This is just about a solution of a weak acid, not about a buffer solution.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: epenguin
Borek said:
The equation you wrote is wrong (check the part under log) and - assuming you meant Henderson-Hasselbalch equation - not applicable to this question.

This is just about a solution of a weak acid, not about a buffer solution.

Thank you for the pointer.
pH= pKa + log ([H+][A-]/[HA]) -> pH= pKa + log ([A-]/[HA]) .

New attempt:

Ka= x2 / C-x => 10-6 = x2 / 0.01-x
=> x2 + 10-6 - 10-8 = 0
I'm stuck at this point. Please help.
 
Ka is not 10-6, C is not 0.01. Not only you started with wrong values, you also made several simple math mistakes while trying to solve.

At least it looks like you are trying to start from a correct equation this time. I wonder if you know what x is and where does this equation come from.
 
Yes the first equation of your new attempt looks as if it could be right if you used the proper brackets. And then the right numerical values as Borek says.
Alternatively or additionally even your corrected equation before that (which is now the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation) can be used together with the information I mentioned previously.
You seem to have used one of my suggestions, not the other.
 
Start from first principles.
What is the equilibrium expression for

HA <——> H+ + A-
 
Last edited:
epenguin said:
You seem to have used one of my suggestions, not the other.

It also helps if you know that a concentrated solution of weak acid will be little dissociated which allows an easy approximation though if you have any qualms about that you can still calculate it more accurately as a check.

You meant, excluding the subtraction of x from C in the denominator, right?

Ka is not 10-6, C is not 0.01. Not only you started with wrong values, you also made several simple math mistakes while trying to solve.

At least it looks like you are trying to start from a correct equation this time. I wonder if you know what x is and where does this equation come from.

Oh! I'm sorry. I hurriedly solved the sum, which is why it was full of mistakes.
Ka= x2 / C
=> 8.4 x 10-4 = x2 / 0.01
=> 8.4 x 10-6 = x2
=> 2.8 x 10 -3= x
I think this time I nailed it!
 
Yes that was what I meant.
But you are not finished.
Everyone makes a % of mistakes in arithmetic etc. or can mix one figure with another, I am never that confident I haven't, :angel: , but your mistake rate is at alarm level! :oldsurprised: You have now made the citric acid concentration 0.01 M, wasn't it 0.1 M?
And you haven't answered the question which was what is the pH?! So you give your evil examiners every excuse to fail you!

If you complete the answer I have a couple of other things to tell you.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
SanjuktaGhosh said:
Ka= x2 / C-x

SanjuktaGhosh said:
Ka= x2 / C

Either - either. These are two different equations. Each has its applicability, but you don't use them at random, you need to check which one can be used.
 
  • #11
SanjuktaGhosh said:
Ka= x2 / C
=> 8.4 x 10-4 = x2 / 0.01
=> 8.4 x 10-6 = x2
=> 2.8 x 10 -3= x
I think this time I nailed it!

I'm sorry, for making such silly mistakes again. Doing maths on computer is really not my thing.

Ka= x2 / C
=> 8.4 x 10-4 = x2 / 0.1
=> 8.4 x 10-5 = x2
=> 9.1 x 10 -3= x
Therefor pH= -log [H] = -log(9.1 x 10 -3)
= -2log3 + 3log10 (rounded off 9.1 into 9)
= -2x 0.477 + 3
= 2.046

@Borek
These are two different equations. Each has its applicability, but you don't use them at random, you need to check which one can be used.
Yup. By now I know where to use them. Thanks for the pointer.

@epenguin
If you complete the answer I have a couple of other things to tell you.

I'm done. Please share.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
SanjuktaGhosh said:
= 2.046

@epenguinI'm done. Please share.

It was just to say that from the HH equation in #4, electroneutrality condition [A-] = [H+], definition of pH, and approximation (C - [H+]) ≈ C you can get the equation, often quoted

pH ≈ (pK - log C)/2

This is completely equivalent to what you did. From that I get pH = 2.033 but the small difference is likely due to your rounding.

It's also convenient for quick mental calculation, useful in laboratory thinking. The pH of a 1M solution of weak acid equals half the pKa; then for every 10 fold dilution it increases by 0.5 (for as long as the approximation you made holds good, which it doesn't very by the time the concentration gets to the order of magnitude of Ka).

The other thing is that citric acid has three acid dissociations from its three carboxylic groups, in your solution only one of these is significantly dissociated, so you don't have to worry here about the others whose pK's are about 4.76 and 6.4
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TytoAlba95
  • #13
Untitled-1.png


(pKa2 = 4.761, pKa3 = 6.396, by default I am using a bit different value for Ka1, but modified it here to the value from the initial post)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TytoAlba95

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K