MHB Evaluate 80t - 20s + 60r - 50q + 70p

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Given a system of simultaneous equations below:

$pqrs+pqrt+pqst+prst=-264$

$pqrs+pqrt+prst+qrst=-24$

$pqrs+pqrt+pqst+qrst=24$

$pqrs+pqst+prst+qrst=248$

$pqrt+pqst+prst+qrst=-16$

Evaluate $80t-20s+60r-50q+70p$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Evaluate 80t-20s+60r-50q+70p

[sp]I think that the best way to do this is to use some linear algebra. Divide the equations by $pqrst$ and write them in matrix form: $$\begin{bmatrix}0&1&1&1&1 \\ 1&0&1&1&1 \\ 1&1&0&1&1 \\ 1&1&1&0&1 \\ 1&1&1&1&0 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix}p^{-1} \\q^{-1} \\r^{-1} \\s^{-1} \\t^{-1} \end{bmatrix} = \frac1{pqrst}\begin{bmatrix}-264 \\ -24 \\ 24 \\ 248 \\ -16 \end{bmatrix}.$$ That $5\times5$ matrix is equal to $5P-I$, where $P$ is the matrix of the projection onto the 1-dimensional subspace spanned by the unit vector $\frac1{\sqrt5}(1,1,1,1,1)$. The inverse of that matrix is $\tfrac54P-I = \dfrac14 \begin{bmatrix}-3&1&1&1&1 \\ 1&-3&1&1&1 \\ 1&1&-3&1&1 \\ 1&1&1&-3&1 \\ 1&1&1&1&-3 \end{bmatrix}.$ It follows that $$\begin{bmatrix}p^{-1} \\q^{-1} \\r^{-1} \\s^{-1} \\t^{-1} \end{bmatrix} = \frac1{4pqrst} \begin{bmatrix}-3&1&1&1&1 \\ 1&-3&1&1&1 \\ 1&1&-3&1&1 \\ 1&1&1&-3&1 \\ 1&1&1&1&-3 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix}-264 \\ -24 \\ 24 \\ 248 \\ -16 \end{bmatrix} = \frac1{pqrst}\begin{bmatrix}256 \\ 16 \\ -32 \\ -256 \\ 8 \end{bmatrix} = \frac1{pqrst}\begin{bmatrix}2^8 \\ 2^4 \\ -2^5 \\ -2^8 \\ 2^3 \end{bmatrix}.$$ If $\Pi = pqrst$ then $p^{-1} = \dfrac{2^8}{\Pi}$, $q^{-1} = \dfrac{2^4}{\Pi}$, $r^{-1} = -\dfrac{2^5}{\Pi}$, $s^{-1} = -\dfrac{2^8}{\Pi}$, $t^{-1} = \dfrac{2^3}{\Pi}.$ Multiply those five equations together to see that $\dfrac1{\Pi} = \dfrac{2^{28}}{\Pi^5}$, from which $\Pi^4 = 2^{28}$ and so $\Pi = 2^7$.

Thus $p = 1/2$, $q = 8$, $r = -4$, $s = -1/2$, $t = 16.$ If I have done the arithmetic correctly, then $80t-20s+60r-50q+70p = 685.$[/sp]

Edit. The left sides of the original equations each contain four of the five products $pqrs$, $pqrt$, $pqst$, $prst$, $qrst$. When I first read the problem, I saw that the first equation uses the four products that include $p$, and the last equation uses the four products that include $t$. I assumed, without stopping to read everything carefully, that if the first equation was a "$p$" equation and the last equation was a "$t$" equation, then the intermediate equations would be the "$q$", "$r$", "$s$" equations, in that order. But anemone points out to me in a PM that the order of the "$q$" and "$r$" equations is reversed. This means that my values for $q$ and $r$ should be exchanged, and that obviously alters the result of the final calculation.
 
Last edited:
Re: Evaluate 80t-20s+60r-50q+70p

Thanks for participating, Opalg! Even though you have read the problem wrongly, I am glad to learn that there is another way (which is different than mine) to approach the problem.:o

My solution:
Divide all given equations by $pqrst$ we get:

$\dfrac{pqrs}{pqrst}+\dfrac{pqrt}{pqrst}+\dfrac{pqst}{pqrst}+\dfrac{prst}{pqrst}=-\dfrac{264}{pqrst}\rightarrow\;\dfrac{1}{t}+\dfrac{1}{s}+\dfrac{1}{r}+\dfrac{1}{q}=-\dfrac{264}{pqrst}-(1)$

$\dfrac{pqrs}{pqrst}+\dfrac{pqrt}{pqrst}+\dfrac{prst}{pqrst}+\dfrac{qrst}{pqrst}=-\dfrac{24}{pqrst} \rightarrow\;\dfrac{1}{t}+\dfrac{1}{s}+\dfrac{1}{q}+\dfrac{1}{p}=-\dfrac{24}{pqrst}-(2)$

$\dfrac{pqrs}{pqrst}+\dfrac{pqrt}{pqrst}+\dfrac{pqst}{pqrst}+\dfrac{qrst}{pqrst}=\dfrac{24}{pqrst} \rightarrow\;\dfrac{1}{t}+\dfrac{1}{s}+\dfrac{1}{r}+\dfrac{1}{p}=\dfrac{24}{pqrst}-(3)$

$\dfrac{pqrs}{pqrst}+\dfrac{pqst}{pqrst}+\dfrac{prst}{pqrst}+\dfrac{qrst}{pqrst}=\dfrac{248}{pqrst} \rightarrow\;\dfrac{1}{t}+\dfrac{1}{r}+\dfrac{1}{q}+\dfrac{1}{p}=\dfrac{248}{pqrst}-(4)$

$\dfrac{pqrt}{pqrst}+\dfrac{pqst}{pqrst}+\dfrac{prst}{pqrst}+\dfrac{qrst}{pqrst}=-\dfrac{16}{pqrst}\rightarrow\;\dfrac{1}{s}+\dfrac{1}{r}+\dfrac{1}{q}+\dfrac{1}{p}=-\dfrac{16}{pqrst}-(5)$

Equation (2) $-$ Equation (1):
$\dfrac{1}{p}-\dfrac{1}{r}=\dfrac{240}{pqrst}-(6)$

Equation (3) $-$ Equation (2):
$\dfrac{1}{r}-\dfrac{1}{q}=\dfrac{48}{pqrst}-(7)$

$\therefore \dfrac{1}{p}-\dfrac{1}{q}=\dfrac{288}{pqrst}--(*)$

Equation (4) $+$ Equation (5):
$\dfrac{1}{t}+\dfrac{1}{s}+2\left(\dfrac{1}{r}+ \dfrac{1}{q}+ \dfrac{1}{p} \right)=\dfrac{232}{pqrst}-(8)$

Equation (7) $-$ Equation (3):
$2\left(\dfrac{1}{q}\right)+ \dfrac{1}{r}+ \dfrac{1}{p}=\dfrac{208}{pqrst}-(9)$

Equation (8) $-$ Equation (6):
$3\left(\dfrac{1}{q}\right)+ \dfrac{1}{p}=\dfrac{160}{pqrst}-(**)$

Solving the equations (*) and (**) simultaneously we get:
$\dfrac{1}{q}=-\dfrac{32}{pqrst},\dfrac{1}{p}=\dfrac{256}{pqrst}, \dfrac{1}{r}=\dfrac{16}{pqrst}, \dfrac{1}{s}=-\dfrac{256}{pqrst}, \dfrac{1}{t}=\dfrac{8}{pqrst}$

Therefore, if we multiply these five equations together, we get
$\dfrac{1}{pqrst}=\dfrac{2^{28}}{(pqrst)^5}$

$\therefore pqrst=2^7$ or $\dfrac{1}{q}=-\dfrac{1}{4},\dfrac{1}{p}=2, \dfrac{1}{r}=\dfrac{1}{8}, \dfrac{1}{s}=-2, \dfrac{1}{t}=\dfrac{1}{16}$.

Hence $80t-20s+60r-50q+70p=80(16)-20(-\dfrac{1}{2})+60(8)-50(-4)+70(\dfrac{1}{2})=2005$.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top