Evaluation of Feynman propagator in position space

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the evaluation of the Feynman propagator in position space, specifically the integral involving the four-momentum in quantum field theory. Participants are tasked with interpreting the result in terms of invariant intervals and analyzing limits related to mass and spacetime separation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the integration of a complex function over momentum space and the implications of contour integration. There are attempts to clarify the treatment of signs in the dot product and the overall structure of the integral. Questions arise regarding the correctness of the expressions and the interpretation of terms in the context of the propagator.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and corrections regarding the mathematical formulation. Some participants express uncertainty about specific sign conventions and the implications of integrating over momentum space. There is a recognition of the need to clarify the relationship between the terms derived from the integral and their physical interpretations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential sign issues and the importance of maintaining consistency in notation, particularly when transitioning between different forms of the propagator. The discussion also highlights the necessity of understanding the limits of the invariant interval in relation to massless and massive cases.

spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31

Homework Statement



Compute ##\displaystyle{\int\ \frac{d^{4}p}{(2\pi)^{4}}} \frac{i}{p^{2}-m^{2}+i\epsilon}e^{-ip \cdot{(x-y)}}## in terms of the invariant interval.

Interpret your answer in the limit of small and large invariant intervals and for zero mass.

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



##\displaystyle{\int\ \frac{d^{4}p}{(2\pi)^{4}}} \frac{i}{p^{2}-m^{2}+i\epsilon}e^{-ip \cdot{(x-y)}}##

##=\displaystyle{\int\ \frac{d^{4}p}{(2\pi)^{4}}} \frac{i}{(p^{0})^{2}-(E_{\vec{p}})^{2}+i\epsilon}e^{-ip \cdot{(x-y)}}##

##=\displaystyle{\int\ \frac{d^{4}p}{(2\pi)^{4}}} \frac{i}{(p^{0})^{2}-(E_{\vec{p}}-i\epsilon)^{2}}e^{-ip \cdot{(x-y)}}##

##=\displaystyle{\int\ \frac{d^{4}p}{(2\pi)^{4}}} \frac{i}{(p^{0}-(E_{\vec{p}}-i\epsilon))(p^{0}+(E_{\vec{p}}-i\epsilon))}e^{-ip \cdot{(x-y)}}##

Therefore, the contour prescription ##i\epsilon## reminds us to integrate under the pole at ##p^{0}=-E_{\vec{p}}## and over the pole at ##p^{0}=E_{\vec{p}}##. So, let's now drop the ##i\epsilon## term and obtain

##=\displaystyle{\int\ \frac{d^{4}p}{(2\pi)^{4}}} \frac{i}{(p^{0}-E_{\vec{p}})(p^{0}+E_{\vec{p}})}e^{-ip \cdot{(x-y)}}##

##=\displaystyle{\int\ \frac{d^{3}p}{(2\pi)^{3}}}\ \bigg[ \int\ \frac{dp^{0}}{2\pi} \frac{i}{(p^{0}-E_{\vec{p}})(p^{0}+E_{\vec{p}})}e^{-ip^{0}(x^{0}-y^{0})} \bigg]\ e^{-ip^{i}(x_{i}-y_{i})}##

For ##x^{0}>y^{0}##, we close the contour below (clockwise sense introduces a negative factor) and for ##x^{0}<y^{0}##, we close the contour above (anti-clockwise sense introduces a positive factor), so that

##=\displaystyle{\int\ \frac{d^{3}p}{(2\pi)^{3}}}\ \bigg[ \int\ \frac{dp^{0}}{2\pi} \frac{i}{(p^{0}-E_{\vec{p}})(p^{0}+E_{\vec{p}})}e^{-ip^{0}(x^{0}-y^{0})} \bigg]\ e^{-ip^{i}(x_{i}-y_{i})}##

##=\displaystyle{\int\ \frac{d^{3}p}{(2\pi)^{3}}}\ \bigg[ \theta(x^{0}-y^{0})\frac{1}{2E_{\vec{p}}}e^{-iE_{\vec{p}}(x^{0}-y^{0})} +\theta(y^{0}-x^{0})\frac{1}{-2E_{\vec{p}}}e^{iE_{\vec{p}}(x^{0}-y^{0})} \bigg]\ e^{-ip^{i}(x_{i}-y_{i})}##

Am I correct so far?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
failexam said:
##=\displaystyle{\int\ \frac{d^{4}p}{(2\pi)^{4}}} \frac{i}{(p^{0}-E_{\vec{p}})(p^{0}+E_{\vec{p}})}e^{-ip \cdot{(x-y)}}##

##=\displaystyle{\int\ \frac{d^{3}p}{(2\pi)^{3}}}\ \bigg[ \int\ \frac{dp^{0}}{2\pi} \frac{i}{(p^{0}-E_{\vec{p}})(p^{0}+E_{\vec{p}})}e^{-ip^{0}(x^{0}-y^{0})} \bigg]\ e^{-ip^{i}(x_{i}-y_{i})}##
There's probably a sign problem here (unless you have somehow absorbed it into the indices) - the temporal and spatial portions of your dot product should have different signs.
 
Well,

##-ip\cdot{(x-y)}=-i[p^{\mu}(x-y)_{\mu}]=-i[p^{0}(x-y)_{0}+p^{i}(x-y)_{i}]##

Now, using the mostly negative signature,

##-i[p^{0}(x-y)_{0}+p^{i}(x-y)_{i}]=-i[p^{0}(x-y)^{0}+p^{i}(x-y)_{i}]=-ip^{0}(x-y)^{0}-ip^{i}(x-y)_{i}]##.

Right?
 
Ah okay, it's somewhat confusing but your negative signs are buried within the subscripts - so in that case, I think whatever you've done seems correct. I think though that its generally cleaner to switch to three-vector notation i.e. ##p \cdot x = E_{\vec{p}} t - \vec{p} \cdot \vec{x}##
 
Ok, so

##=\displaystyle{\int\ \frac{d^{4}p}{(2\pi)^{4}}} \frac{i}{(p^{0}-E_{\vec{p}})(p^{0}+E_{\vec{p}})}e^{-ip \cdot{(x-y)}}##

##=\displaystyle{\int\ \frac{d^{3}p}{(2\pi)^{3}}}\ \bigg[ \int\ \frac{dp^{0}}{2\pi} \frac{i}{(p^{0}-E_{\vec{p}})(p^{0}+E_{\vec{p}})}e^{-ip^{0}(x^{0}-y^{0})} \bigg]\ e^{i\vec{p}(\vec{x}-\vec{y})}##

For ##x^{0}>y^{0}##, we close the contour below (clockwise sense introduces a negative factor) and for ##x^{0}<y^{0}##, we close the contour above (anti-clockwise sense introduces a positive factor), so that

##=\displaystyle{\int\ \frac{d^{3}p}{(2\pi)^{3}}}\ \bigg[ \int\ \frac{dp^{0}}{2\pi} \frac{i}{(p^{0}-E_{\vec{p}})(p^{0}+E_{\vec{p}})}e^{-ip^{0}(x^{0}-y^{0})} \bigg]\ e^{i\vec{p}(\vec{x}-\vec{y})}##

##=\displaystyle{\int\ \frac{d^{3}p}{(2\pi)^{3}}}\ \bigg[ \theta(x^{0}-y^{0})\frac{1}{2E_{\vec{p}}}e^{-iE_{\vec{p}}(x^{0}-y^{0})} +\theta(y^{0}-x^{0})\frac{1}{2E_{\vec{p}}}e^{iE_{\vec{p}}(x^{0}-y^{0})} \bigg]\ e^{i\vec{p}(\vec{x}-\vec{y})}##

##=\displaystyle{\theta(x^{0}-y^{0})\int\ \frac{d^{3}p}{(2\pi)^{3}}}\ \bigg[\frac{1}{2E_{\vec{p}}}e^{-iE_{\vec{p}}(x^{0}-y^{0})}e^{i\vec{p}(\vec{x}-\vec{y})} \bigg]+\theta(y^{0}-x^{0})\int\ \frac{d^{3}p}{(2\pi)^{3}}\ \bigg[\frac{1}{2E_{\vec{p}}}e^{iE_{\vec{p}}(x^{0}-y^{0})} e^{i\vec{p}(\vec{x}-\vec{y})}\bigg]##

The first term gives ##=\displaystyle{\theta(x^{0}-y^{0})\int\ \frac{d^{3}p}{(2\pi)^{3}}}\ \bigg[\frac{1}{2E_{\vec{p}}}e^{-iE_{\vec{p}}(x^{0}-y^{0})}e^{i\vec{p}(\vec{x}-\vec{y})} \bigg]=\displaystyle{\theta(x^{0}-y^{0})\int\ \frac{d^{3}p}{(2\pi)^{3}}}\ \bigg[\frac{1}{2E_{\vec{p}}}e^{-ip\cdot{(x-y)}} \bigg]\bigg|_{p^{0}=E_{\vec{p}}}=D(x-y)##.

How do I convert the second term to ##-D(y-x)##?
 
I think it should be just ##D(y-x)## and not ##-D(y-x)##. The trick is to flip the sign of ##\vec{p}##, which is a valid operation because we are integrating over the entire ##p##-volume, and all other quantities only depend on the magnitude of ##\vec{p}##.
 

Similar threads

Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K