Evolution of radio sources mimics a non-expanding universe

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter member 673059
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cosmology
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the article "Distance Duality Test: The Evolution of Radio Sources Mimics a Nonexpanding Universe" by Pengfei Li, which examines the Distance Duality Relation (DDR) using ultracompact radio sources observed at 2.29 GHz and 5.0 GHz. The findings indicate that the DDR aligns with a nonexpanding universe, challenging conventional cosmological models. The study assumes constant luminosity density, leading to a significant conclusion that the evolution of radio luminosity density mimics a nonexpanding universe, raising questions about potential fine-tuning issues. Additionally, the authorship of Pengfei Li is clarified, distinguishing between two physicists with the same name.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Distance Duality Relation (DDR)
  • Familiarity with ultracompact radio sources
  • Knowledge of redshift and its implications in cosmology
  • Basic principles of astrophysics and cosmological models
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Distance Duality Relation in cosmology
  • Study the properties and characteristics of ultracompact radio sources
  • Explore the concept of redshift and its role in astrophysical observations
  • Investigate the differences between expanding and nonexpanding universe models
USEFUL FOR

Astrophysicists, cosmologists, and researchers interested in the fundamental principles of the universe, particularly those focused on the implications of radio source observations and the Distance Duality Relation.

member 673059
new article by Pengfei Li:

Distance Duality Test: The Evolution of Radio Sources Mimics a Nonexpanding Universe

Abstract:

Distance duality relation (DDR) marks a fundamental difference between expanding and nonexpanding universes, as an expanding metric causes angular diameter distance smaller than luminosity distance by an extra factor of (1 + z). Here we report a test of this relation using two independent samples of ultracompact radio sources observed at 2.29 GHz and 5.0 GHz. The test with radio sources involves only geometry, so it is independent of cosmological models. Since the observed radio luminosities systematically increase with redshift, we do not assume a constant source size. Instead, we start with assuming the intensive property, luminosity density, does not evolve with redshift and then infer its evolution from the resultant DDR. We make the same assumption for both samples, and find it results in the same angular size–redshift relation. Interestingly, the resultant DDR is fully consistent with a nonexpanding universe. Imposing the DDR predicted by the expanding universe, we infer the radio luminosity density evolves as ρL ∝ (1 + z)^3. However, the perfect agreement with a nonexpanding universe under the assumption of constant luminosity densities poses a conspiracy and fine-tuning problem: the size and luminosity density of ultracompact radio sources evolve in the way that precisely mimics a nonexpanding universe.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: Motore and ohwilleke
Space news on Phys.org
Madeleine Birchfield said:
tl;dr I was wondering if this was the same person as the previously published astrophysics articles under this name. It is but may be his first solo article and so isn't influenced by the academic agendas of his PhD advisors.

One tricky point is that there are multiple currently publishing physicists named Pengfei Li (unsurprisingly, as "Li" is an exceedingly common Chinese surname, and "Pengfei" is not a particularly uncommon Chinese given name).

There is a Pengfei Li who is a co-author of quite a few publications, primarily in the astrophysics of galaxies, at the Department of Astronomy of Case Western Reserve University in Ohio. It isn't obvious to me whether or not this author is the same person.

It is a little outside the range of the typical work of the Case Western Reserve author, who usually publishes more mainstream empirical work in the astrophysics of galaxies and usually publishes papers with co-authors, but not all that far outside the range of the typical work of that author, so it is hard to tell.

The linked article is by a Pengfei Li, as a solo author, who is a Humboldt fellow at the Leibniz-Institute for Astrophysics in Potsdam, Germany, so I suspect that this is a different person (who is much less established in the field) pursuing a far more speculative hypothesis than is typical for the Pengfei Li of Case Western Reserve University.

Pengfei Li of Germany got his PhD in Astronomy from Case Western Reserve University in 2020, so it could very well be that this is the same person and that Pengfei Li's co-authorships were as a doctoral student and/or as a post-doc with a subject matter of the other papers that reflects his PhD advisor's scholarship interests, rather than his own. The bibliography at the link suggests that it is indeed the same person.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 134 ·
5
Replies
134
Views
11K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K