Examples of Media hype of technical issues

  • Thread starter Thread starter .Scott
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the impact of electromagnetic (EM) emissions from satellites, particularly those from SpaceX's Starlink, on radio astronomy. Participants explore the implications of these emissions, their regulatory status, and the potential for interference with astronomical observations.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that EM emissions from satellite circuitry can be measured from Earth and may interfere with radio astronomy, particularly in protected frequencies.
  • Others argue that the emissions do not violate EMC regulatory requirements and question the severity of the interference, suggesting that the emissions are low power and not classified as traditional EMI.
  • A participant points out that the protection for astronomical sensors only applies to the immediate area of the telescope, implying that satellites outside these boundaries do not have their emissions regulated.
  • One participant humorously questions the notion of "leaking" radiation, suggesting a misunderstanding of the term in this context.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism about the significance of the problem, arguing that the brief time satellites cross the beam of antennas minimizes potential interference.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the significance of satellite emissions and their impact on radio astronomy. While some acknowledge a potential problem, others downplay its severity, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the current understanding of the interference issue, including the definitions of protected frequencies and the transient nature of satellite emissions relative to radio telescope observations.

.Scott
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
3,937
Reaction score
1,969
Sometimes a news story just isn't much of a news story without some serious spin.

In this case, the basic story is that EM emissions from the electronic circuitry on satellites is measurable from the Earth's surface and is likely to interfere with radio astronomy.
These EM emission are at low frequencies and very low power. They do not violate any EMC regulatory requirements. In fact, they don't really fall under the definitions of "EMI" or "Radiative Emissions" (although they are radiative emissions).
So, you might want to title such an article "Satellite EM emissions a problem for Radio Astronomy". But does that title really grab you?

How about this: "SpaceX's Starlink Satellites Are Leaking Radiation, Scientists Confirm"

Of course, you're thinking "Leaking Radiation", hmmm, electric shaver, laptop, auto ignition system, but certainly not Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, Fukushima. Right?
 
Reply
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
Computer science news on Phys.org
What I read is that, specifically, they are leaking radiation in the protected frequencies of astronomical sensors. And it's enough to interfere with earth-based instruments. And that's a problem that will certainly get worse as we increase the constellations of sats in our skies.
 
DaveC426913 said:
What I read is that, specifically, they are leaking radiation in the protected frequencies of astronomical sensors.
The protection only extends to the immediate area of the telescope.
Since the satellites are outside those boundaries, the frequencies are not protected.
So, the satellites fall in the same category as your electric razor.
Of course, there is a valid point. As Radio Astronomy becomes more sensitive and satellites become more numerous, there is a growing resource sharing issue..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
Leaking? Can't you just put a lid on it?
(I bet people think this about Elon Musk all the time)
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
I really don't think there is a problem.

The satellite will spend less than a second crossing the beam of the antenna. That is nothing new.

Satellites are nearby point sources, so signals will not correlate during interferometry.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: .Scott and berkeman