Suekdccia
- 352
- 30
Such as Lisa Randall, Fabiola Gianotti, Shirley Ann Jackson, Ingrid Daubechies, Donna Strickland or Jocelyn Bell Burnell
The discussion revolves around notable female physicists, exploring their contributions and recognition in the field of physics. Participants mention various individuals and their achievements, reflecting on the criteria for fame and recognition in science.
Participants present multiple competing views on what constitutes "really famous" and the criteria for recognition in physics. There is no consensus on the definitions or the significance of the contributions of the individuals mentioned.
Some discussions touch on the historical context and classification of women in physics versus mathematics, indicating potential limitations in how contributions are recognized and credited.
Hamiltonian299792458 said:Marie Curie!

Watson and Crick need her data to decipher DNA structure. Should she have shared the prize?DaveE said:Rosalind Franklin deserves a vote, but y'all will probably call her a physical chemist.