B Excellent Free Course On Einsten, Relativity, His Views Etc from Harvard

  • Thread starter Thread starter bhobba
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Einstein Harvard
Click For Summary
The discussion highlights a free course on Einstein and Relativity offered by Harvard, which delves into Einstein's differences with Poincare and includes insights into Poincare's engineering background. It also addresses debates in quantum mechanics, notably correcting Heisenberg's indeterminacy principle as clarified by Bohr. The course is designed to be accessible for high school and middle school students, with the full version requiring essay writing for college credit. The participant found the course enjoyable and recommends it highly. Overall, it provides a comprehensive understanding of Einstein's contributions and controversies in physics.
Messages
10,946
Reaction score
3,818
Hi All

I just finished the following course on Einstein and Relativity:

https://www.edx.org/learn/humanities/harvard-university-the-einstein-revolution

It is especially interesting as it goes into the details of how he differed from Poincare. I was fascinated by some of Poincare's accomplishments in the field of Mining Engineering. A few great scientists had engineering degrees (Dirac and von Neumann), but Poincare took his engineering very seriously.

Of course, it also touches on his debates about QM. It is one of the few accounts that points out Heisenberg got the indeterminacy principle wrong and had to be corrected by Bohr.

It is accessible to high school students and probably even middle school students. If you take the full course rather than auditing it like I did, there is a lot of essay writing. If you take the full course, the college credit you get is definitely earned.

I found the course a delight and highly recommend it.

Thanks
Bill
 
  • Like
Likes member 728827, Demystifier, Drakkith and 4 others
Physics news on Phys.org
Thank you, very appreciated.
 
In Birkhoff’s theorem, doesn’t assuming we can use r (defined as circumference divided by ## 2 \pi ## for any given sphere) as a coordinate across the spacetime implicitly assume that the spheres must always be getting bigger in some specific direction? Is there a version of the proof that doesn’t have this limitation? I’m thinking about if we made a similar move on 2-dimensional manifolds that ought to exhibit infinite order rotational symmetry. A cylinder would clearly fit, but if we...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
9K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 110 ·
4
Replies
110
Views
24K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
8K