Exchange force carrier between two protons

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of force carriers in particle interactions, specifically focusing on whether the Z boson can act as an exchange particle between protons and electrons, similar to the photon. The scope includes theoretical considerations of particle physics and the implications of mass on force mediation.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the role of the virtual photon in the repulsion between electrons and questions if the Z boson, being neutral, could serve a similar role in interactions between protons.
  • Another participant explains that while the Z meson can be regarded as a force carrier, its massive nature results in a short-range interaction, contrasting with the long-range effect of the massless photon.
  • It is noted that the electromagnetic interaction is significantly stronger than the weak interaction at the relevant scales, suggesting that the Z boson is not a practical mediator for such interactions.
  • One participant challenges the idea that the weak interaction is inherently weak, arguing that it is the mass of the W and Z bosons that limits their range and effectiveness, rather than an intrinsic weakness.
  • Another participant reiterates that the Z boson cannot mediate interactions between electrons or protons due to its mass, which prevents it from traveling the distances required for electromagnetic interactions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the role and effectiveness of the Z boson as a force carrier, with some asserting its limitations due to mass while others debate the strength of weak interactions compared to electromagnetic forces. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the potential for the Z boson to mediate interactions in the same way as photons.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the dependence on the mass of particles in determining their role as force carriers and the implications for interaction ranges, but does not resolve the complexities involved in these interactions.

CAF123
Gold Member
Messages
2,918
Reaction score
87
I know that the virtual exchange particle between two electrons is the photon and this explains why they repel each other (ie virtual photon is spontaneously emitted from one electron A causing it to recoil. As the virtual photon hits electron B, it imparts momentum causing it to move away so that electron A and B move away in the opposite direction, as needed for conservation of momentum).

My question is can a Z particle also be the exchange carrier here because it too is neutral? I have the same question for the case of two protons.
Many thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CAF123, You could regard the Z meson as a force carrier, like a photon, but there's a big difference -- the photon is massless, so the force field it produces (a Coulomb field) is long range, i.e. 1/r. The Z meson, on the other hand, is massive, very massive: 90 GeV. This means the force field it produces is short range (a Yukawa field), i.e. one that falls off exponentially, with a range equal to the Compton wavelength. The Compton wavelength of a 90 GeV particle is about .001 fermi, or 1/1000 the diameter of a proton.

Needless to say, at such a short range the interaction between two electrons (or two quarks) will be dominated by other effects, and so regarding the Z meson as having produced a force field is simply not a useful concept.
virtual photon is spontaneously emitted from one electron A causing it to recoil. As the virtual photon hits electron B, it imparts momentum causing it to move away so that electron A and B move away in the opposite direction
.
Might as well take this opportunity to point out that your attempt to visualize this interaction ignores its quantum nature. You're imagining that the momentum they exchange is in the same direction as the spatial separation between them. Therefore it appears to cause a repulsion. (And so, often we are asked next, then how can opposite charges possibly attract??) In fact, the interaction includes an integration over ALL momenta: forwards, backwards and sideways. The intensity of the interaction generates an effective potential, and the resulting force between the charges arises from the gradient of this potential.
 
I believe another reason is that the electromagnetic interaction at this scale is a lot stronger (order of [itex]10^8[/itex] ) than that of the weak interaction
 
Nope, this is false. If you're talking about the interaction between the W or Z meson and other particles, it is about the same strength as electromagnetism.

The weak interactions only appear weak, due to the large masses of the W and Z. In a beta decay, for example, the W is not directly observed. It's virtual, an intermediate product of the decay. And since the decay energy is so much less than the W mass, the W is far off the mass shell, and this reduces the decay rate.

They're not intrinsically weak, just short range.
 
CAF123 said:
I know that the virtual exchange particle between two electrons is the photon and this explains why they repel each other (ie virtual photon is spontaneously emitted from one electron A causing it to recoil. As the virtual photon hits electron B, it imparts momentum causing it to move away so that electron A and B move away in the opposite direction, as needed for conservation of momentum).

My question is can a Z particle also be the exchange carrier here because it too is neutral? I have the same question for the case of two protons.
Many thanks

Protons are made up of quarks, which transmit forces via photons (electromagnetism) and gluons (strong force) themselves.

Z bosons can't mediate the interaction between two electrons or protons due to their mass. That is, they have mass so they can't travel as far as photons or gluons (both massless), which is required for the force particles of electromagnetism.

Additionally, the EM force has been observed repeatedly to travel at the speed of light, something impossible for the Z (which has mass), a direct consequence of special relativity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
984
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K