I Expansion of Space: Questions on How the Universe Works

Martyn Arthur
Messages
114
Reaction score
20
TL;DR Summary
The Expansion of Space Overall Beyond the Visible Universe
I first apologize if this has been posted more than once; sorry.
There is a lack of clarity at my end as to whether I am logged on here?

Say we have two galaxies, the Milky Way (MW) and galaxy A separated along a straight line 20 x the radius of the Universe visible to us.
If I understand correctly then the rate of the physical expansion of space between MW and A could be at the rate of say,
Hi, may I ask a question, please?
Say we have two galaxies, the Milky Way (MW) and galaxy A separated along a straight line 20 x the radius of the Universe visible to us.
The MW is considered a stationary observer.
Then disregarding for the purpose of this any other objects or influences.
If I understand correctly then the rate of the physical expansion of space between MW and A could be at the rate of say, arbitrarily, 10 x c.
I understand that those two galaxies aren't moving through space, the entirety of space between them is physically expanding.
If we then have galaxy D positioned along the same line, just at the edge of our visible Universe which we observe being redshifted relative to the MW at the rate of 1 x c.
Then I understand that the entirety of space between MW and A is expanding at the [arbitrary] rate of 10 x c.
So that the "elastic band" comprising the space between MW and A must presumably be carrying everything within it at the same rate.
So then why then is it that galaxy D is not seen as being redshifted / transported within that "elastic band" away from the MW at 1/2 x 10 x c?
Thinking from another perspective.
If there are two galaxies separated for now along a straight line 200 x the radius of the Universe visible to us.
Is the space between those galaxies expanding at a "commensurate" rate?
If the Universe is infinite does that lad to a concept that the rate of expansion is infinite?
Thanks
Martyn
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top