MHB Expected Value of Gambling Game: Solve It Now!

eatinbyzombies3
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Here is the question: You are playing a gambling game (silly, yea I know). The first part of the game is to throw a die. If it comes up a 3, you move on. Otherwise, you lose. The second part of the game entails pulling a card out of a standard deck. If it is a heart, you win $100. Otherwise, you lose. What is the expected value of the game?

Here is what I know: you have a 1 out of 6 chance of rolling a 3 and a 13 out of 52 (i hope) chance of pulling a heart.

I don't know how to get the answer that is needed. Can anyone help me?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: help, I am confused

Are you supposed to find the expected profit? If so, what is the buy-in to the game?

edit: I have edited the topic title to reflect the nature of the problem.
 
MarkFL,
I don't know. that is the question word for word that I have on my paper from my Professor. That is what is confusing, it just says "What is the expected value of the game?"
 
Are you given an answer that you are expected to be able to compute?
 
$$E[X]=\sum_{x} x \cdot P[X=x]$$
That seems complicated but it's not so bad. Assuming there is no buy-in to play the game and that the only payout occurs when you get a 3 and a heart, the above equation simplifies to:

$$E[X]=100 \cdot P[X= \text{3 and a heart}]$$

Now you just need to figure out that probability of getting a 3 and a heart and you'll be done. :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top