Explain why Mo–95 & La–139 are more stable than U–235

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bolter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explain Stable
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 1K views
Bolter
Messages
262
Reaction score
31
Homework Statement
See question below
Relevant Equations
None
Hey everyone!

So I have attempted this Q which is shown below

Screenshot 2020-04-20 at 20.24.38.png

I had a go at all the parts and I think they are right
but I'm not so sure on what answer to give for c)iii, I mentioned about the ratio of protons to neutrons but I'm not sure if that is necessary over here?

IMG_4646.JPG

IMG_4647.jpg


Any help would be grateful! Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

The Semiempirical Mass formula gives an idea of binding energy in nuclei. It treats the nuclei as fluid, so a number of terms are introduced: volume, surface tension, coulomb repulsion among protons, symmetry, and pairing neutron-proton.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semi-empirical_mass_formula

There are a number of factors that weaken heavy nuclei, the most important is the Coulomb repulsion among protons. In this graph, each component of the mass formula is displayed, so you can see which one changes the most from A~240, to A~100.
https://www.slideserve.com/sasha/the-semi-empirical-mass-formula

I hope it helps.

Regards,
ORF
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz