Explaining Missing Decimal Numbers 3, 6 & 9 in Calculations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hippasos
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the absence of decimal numbers 3, 6, and 9 in certain calculations involving fractions like 1/7 and its decimal expansions. Participants explain that the long division process inherently limits the possible remainders to 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6, which explains why certain digits do not appear. The unique properties of the number 7 allow for a maximum of six unique digits in its decimal expansion, making it distinct among integers. The conversation highlights the mathematical reasoning behind these observations rather than viewing them as mere anomalies. Understanding these patterns in decimal expansions can provide deeper insights into number theory.
Hippasos
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
1/56=0,017857142857142857142857...142857

1/7=0,142857142857142857142857...142857

142857

142857/7=
20408,142857142857142857...142857

20408/7=
2915,42857142857142857...142857

2915/7=
416,42857142857142857142857...142857

416/7=
59,42857142857142857142857...142857

59/7=
8,42857142857142857142857...142857

8/7
1,142857142857142857142857...142857

Missing decimal numbers 3 - why are these"missing"? Not needed even during calculations - at all?

Can You please explain?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what's to explain? it's just the result of particular calculations.

Hey, try 1/3 = .333333 you don't need 1,2,4,5,6,7,8, or 9 Explain that !
 
phinds said:
what's to explain? it's just the result of particular calculations.

Hey, try 1/3 = .333333 you don't need 1,2,4,5,6,7,8, or 9 Explain that !

Yes of course my stupid mistake. I was *runk and it was late. Still interesting ...142857.. cycles there.
 
Hey! don't dismiss your observation so quickly. It is very interesting and if you look at the long division process you can see just why there are no 3 or multiples of, in the decimal expansion.

First of all observe that there are at most 6 digits possible. There is a limited set of possible remainders in the long division process{1,2,3,4,5,6}. A zero would terminate the process, 7 and greater means that you have not made a correct choice of a multiplier. This implies that there can be at most 6 digits in the expansion. 7 is unique in that it is the only integer with the max possible number of unique digits in the decimal expansion.

Now let's go through the long division process and see if we can see why 3 does not appear.

The first step:

10/7 = 1 r 3 : so 1 is the first digit the remainder sets up the second step, r*10
30/7 = 4 t 2 : so 4 is the 2nd digit.
20/7= 2 r 6 : so 2 is the 3rd digit.

now we can see why 3 does not appear, each of the steps involves a multiple of 10 divided by 7. But the only way to get a 3 would be if you could have a non zero as the last digit, this cannot happen. Since 7*3=21 and 7*4=28.

I also find this an interesting little tidbit. Hope I helped throw some light on it for you.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
517
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K