Explore Schrodinger's Model of an Atom

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter benzun_1999
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atom
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Schrödinger's model of the atom revolutionizes the understanding of electron behavior, asserting that electrons do not possess a well-defined position or velocity. Instead, their locations are represented as probability clouds surrounding the nucleus, which effectively disproves the classical Bohr model. This model addresses fundamental issues in classical physics, such as the emission of electromagnetic radiation by accelerating charged particles, by introducing quantum mechanics principles. Schrödinger's equations allow for the calculation of probability distributions, leading to the visualization of electron subshell shapes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum mechanics fundamentals
  • Understanding of Schrödinger's equations
  • Basic principles of electromagnetism
  • Familiarity with the Bohr model of the atom
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Schrödinger's wave equation in detail
  • Explore the concept of electron probability clouds
  • Learn about the uncertainty principle and its implications
  • Investigate the differences between the Bohr model and quantum mechanical models
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in advanced atomic theory and electron behavior.

benzun_1999
Messages
260
Reaction score
0
dear reader,

I came across shrodinger's model of an atom. it said that electrons don't move. it is completely weird and it is tough for me to get any idea of it.

-benzun
all for god
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by benzun_1999
dear reader,

I came across shrodinger's model of an atom. it said that electrons don't move. it is completely weird and it is tough for me to get any idea of it.

-benzun
all for god

Yes it is tough, but it is important to wrap your mind around if you care about how the world is made.

Stating that the electrons don't move is not quite right. What quantum mechanics says is that they dont't have a well-defined position or velocity. Their position and speed are not zero but something that is not definite and constantly changes.

Sometimes this is visualized as a cloud, representing the probability that the electron is at some point near the nucleus. And you could form a similar cloud showing the probability that the electron has any given speed.


If the electrons were truly little particles whirling around the nucleus like planets around the sun, then atoms wouldn't work. For circling is acceleration (basic physics) and accelerating charged particles will radiate EM waves (basic electromagnetism - see the "accelerated charges" thread up in Classical Physics). So the electrons would radiate EM. And this would give two problems:
1) We don't see this EM radiation coming out of atoms, and
2) The electron, by emitting that EM would lose energy, and couldn't keep up its orbit, it would spiral into the nucleus and be lost.


Even before modern quantum mechanics was invented in the 1920s, physicsists knew about these problems and the dealt with them by "magic". Bohr said, well the electrons in their orbits just DON'T radiate, unlike every other kind of charged particle. Other physicists were uneasy about this, but whaddaya going to do?

Then Heisenberg, and Schroedinger, and Dirac came along and all was light. Probabilities solved the problem.
 
but....

I thought that his discovery had to do with something related to subshells of an atom
 
No. What Schrödinger did was to derive a mathematical treatment of quantum effects based on waves. From this, he got the uncertainty relation - that a particle cannot be said to have a well defined position and a well defined momentum at the same time, which effectively disproved the Bohr model (the electrons flying around the nucleus) there and then. By using his equations, it is possible to calculate the probability distributions of the positions of electrons of a certain energy - and the visualisations of these probability distributions we call the "shape" of the electron subshell.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
917
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K