Explore the Endless Possibilities of Categories

  • Thread starter Thread starter meteor
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of categories in category theory, exploring the nature and properties of various types of functors, including fully faithful functors, contravariant functors, and the notion of star categories. Participants engage in defining these concepts, referencing existing literature, and debating the nuances of definitions and properties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that there is an infinite number of categories and discuss the implications of this statement.
  • There is a proposal to use the thread as a general purpose discussion for basic category theory, including definitions of functors and their properties.
  • Definitions of fully faithful functors and contravariant functors are provided, with references to Saunders MacLane's work.
  • Participants express uncertainty about the completeness of definitions regarding star categories and challenge each other's interpretations.
  • One participant suggests that the definition of a star category may not fully capture Baez's concept, indicating a need for further refinement.
  • There is a discussion about the relationship between different categories, such as Hilb and vector spaces, and the potential for infinite variations of categories.
  • Some participants express a desire for clarification on specific terms, such as sheaves, indicating varying levels of familiarity with the subject matter.
  • There is mention of the complexity of defining "kinds" of categories, suggesting that the discussion may hinge on specific definitions and contexts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a mix of agreement and disagreement, particularly regarding the definitions and properties of star categories and functors. There is no clear consensus on the completeness of definitions or the interpretation of certain concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various definitions and properties from literature, indicating that the discussion may depend on specific interpretations and assumptions about category theory. Some definitions may not be universally accepted or may require additional context to be fully understood.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying category theory, particularly in understanding the nuances of functors and the definitions of various types of categories. It may also benefit individuals seeking clarification on foundational concepts in mathematics.

  • #31
If objects can be replaced between categories, do we get mathematical structures that can be ordered by their abilities to replace objects, and if so, how this CAT structure will look like?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Your last post looks like something that organic would post and makes no sense at all so I correspondenigly refuse to answer it.
 
  • #33
I'm wondering if there exist a category in which the objects are tensors; if this category exist, please what's its name and what morphisms it has.
 
  • #34
Whilst there are tensor categories you ought to bear in mind these tensors are not the tensors I'm guessing you know about (invariant under rotation), so don't be mislead.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
6K