Exploring E-e Repulsion: Stability of Half and Full P Sub-Shells Explained

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter htneT
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Repulsion
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the stability of half-filled and fully filled p sub-shells in comparison to filled s sub-shells, particularly focusing on the role of electron-electron (e-e) repulsion and ionization energy (I.E). Participants explore the reasons behind the perceived stability of these electron configurations within the context of atomic structure and behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that a half-filled p sub-shell is stable due to the absence of repulsion, as electrons occupy orbitals singly before pairing according to Hund's rule, but questions why a fully occupied p sub-shell is also considered stable.
  • Another participant notes that the ionization energy of helium is slightly less than twice that of hydrogen, suggesting that helium is more inert than hydrogen.
  • Some participants inquire about the relationship between electron-electron repulsion and the stability of filled sub-shells, specifically questioning the stability of a full p sub-shell versus a full s sub-shell.
  • A participant challenges the comparison of ionization energies, pointing out that the discussion seems to conflate helium's properties with those of hydrogen and misrepresents the electron configurations involved.
  • There is a suggestion that all electrons in a multi-electron atom experience e-e repulsion, regardless of the sub-shell, leading to questions about the criteria used to define stability or instability in this context.
  • Another participant emphasizes that ionization energy is influenced by both the number of electrons and the nuclear charge, indicating that stability cannot be solely attributed to electron configuration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the stability of filled p and s sub-shells, with no consensus reached regarding the role of electron-electron repulsion and its impact on ionization energy. The discussion remains unresolved as participants explore various aspects of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Limitations in the discussion include potential misunderstandings regarding the electron configurations of hydrogen and helium, as well as the factors influencing ionization energy beyond electron repulsion.

htneT
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
I am fully aware that a half filled p sub-shell is stable due to no repulsion as electrons first occupy the orbitals singly before pairing up according to Hunds rule, why is that however a fully occupied p sub-shell with 6 electrons is also considered stable? Where as a filled s sub-shell with 2 electrons is said to undergo e-e repulsion, hence the I.E value of He is less than that of Hydrogen's I.E by a factor of 2 (90% to be exact).

In short: Why is a full p sub-shell with 6 electrons not said to undergo e-e repulsion (considered stable), whereas a full s sub-shell with 2 electrons is said to undergo e-e repulsion (unstable).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The ionization energy of Helium is a little less than twice that of atomic hydrogen, i.e. helium is more inert than atomic hydrogen.
See the table of values here.
 
Doesn't it have to do with e-e repulsion?
 
htneT said:
Doesn't it have to do with e-e repulsion?
Does what have to do with electron-electron repulsion? You said that helium has a lower ionization energy than helium, which is not the case. Similarly you are talking about p sub-shells but only referring to hydrogen and helium, which only have half and fully filled 1s sub-shells respectively.
 
Vagn said:
Does what have to do with electron-electron repulsion? You said that helium has a lower ionization energy than helium, which is not the case. Similarly you are talking about p sub-shells but only referring to hydrogen and helium, which only have half and fully filled 1s sub-shells respectively.
My main question is why is a full p sub-shell considered stable, whereas a full s sub-shell considered unstable and its electrons undergo e-e repulsion?
 
htneT said:
Where as a filled s sub-shell with 2 electrons is said to undergo e-e repulsion
Each electron in a multi-electron atom will of course experience e-e repulsion regardless of which subshell the electron under consideration occupies.
htneT said:
a full s sub-shell considered unstable
What is the measure of stability/instability you are using, I.E.? Ionization energy is not only determined by the number of electrons present in the atom, but also by the nuclear charge.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 264 ·
9
Replies
264
Views
33K