I Exploring Non-locality in Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Derek P
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mwi Non-locality
  • #61
akvadrako said:
The reason the wavefunction must be ontic (which that I mean maps 1-to-1 onto reality) is given by the PBR and Colbeck and Renner theorems.
Indeed so but that's a weaker sense of ontic than I was using. I was just meaning that there is no reason why reality must actually be the wavefunction. A 1-1 map would be fine.
 

Similar threads

I In the many worlds interpretation, how do the worlds join?
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
I What is the true nature of worlds in the Many-Worlds Interpretation?
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Question about entanglement over large distances
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
I How Does the Many-Worlds Interpretation Address Nonlocality?
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
I Many worlds and interference
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
I No relativistic Bohmian mechanics and superluminal causation
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
3K
I Exploring Measurements in Quantum Field Theory: From Light Cones to Bell Tests
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
7K
Understanding MWI in Quantum Physics
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
A Dieter Zeh's MWI as Schrödinger equation + further assumptions
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
I MWI proven wrong by penning trap experiments?
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K