How Can Variational Calculus Enhance Your Understanding of Quantum Mechanics?

Click For Summary
Variational calculus is highlighted as a crucial tool in transitioning from Newtonian to Quantum Mechanics, particularly in understanding wave functions. Recommendations for textbooks include "Advanced Calculus" by Loomis and "Classical Mechanics" by Goldstein, which delve into mechanics and variational principles. The discussion emphasizes the importance of grasping linear algebra and Dirac notation for a modern understanding of quantum mechanics. It notes that older quantum mechanics texts focus on wave functions and integrals, while newer ones favor Dirac notation and Hilbert space concepts. Engaging with a knowledgeable instructor is also encouraged for deeper insights.
aliaze1
Messages
173
Reaction score
1
I am taking a Quantum Mechanics course this semester and the professor started off by showing us how Newtonian Mechanics lead to Lagrangian Mechanics, then Hamiltonian...etc...until we got to the Quantum Mechanical wave functions.

This was all done in a quantitative sense, using variational calculus. Does anyone know of any good mathematics/physics/mathematical physics textbook that goes into this type of detail for mechanics? I was looking into "Advanced Calculus" by Loomis, since Loomis' Calculus book was amazing, I imagine the Advanced book would be good too..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you have got a very good teacher. many times such personal viewpoints are impossible to find in any book. and taking lessons from classroom is the only way to get such personal viewpoints. so absorb it as much as you can. discuss with the person too. you will not get a chance later on.
 
Of course you'll need some calculus, but I also suggest you get a good understanding of linear algebra. You might also start looking at the Dirac notation (after you study a little linear algebra).
In older QM books you see states expressed in terms of wave functions with integrals, etc. and a lot of calculus. Newer books use more the Dirac notation, which is based on the linear algebra and the fact that you can represent functions in a "Hilbert space"
Books:
"Classical Mechanics" by Herbert Goldstein.
"Mathematical Methods for Physicsists" Arfken.
"Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences" is also good. But Arfken is a little more advanced I think. It wouldn't hurt having both.
 
I am slowly going through the book 'What Is a Quantum Field Theory?' by Michel Talagrand. I came across the following quote: One does not" prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics. The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments. Although it may seem trite, it does fit in with my modelling view of QM. The more I think about it, the more I believe it could be saying something quite profound. For example, precisely what is the justification of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
554