Exploring the Angular Size-Redshift Relation in Cosmology

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TrickyDicky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angular Relation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the angular size-redshift relation in cosmology, specifically regarding the L-CDM model's predictions for redshifts greater than z=1.6. It highlights the technical challenges associated with high redshift observations and references Gurvits 1998, which provided inconclusive results. The lack of observational data supporting the predicted increase in angular size for objects with z>1.5 is identified as a significant weakness of the CDM model. Participants are encouraged to share more recent observations that could clarify these discrepancies.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the L-CDM cosmological model
  • Familiarity with redshift concepts in astrophysics
  • Knowledge of angular size measurements in cosmology
  • Awareness of observational challenges in high redshift astronomy
NEXT STEPS
  • Research recent studies on angular size measurements at high redshifts
  • Explore updated observational data related to the L-CDM model
  • Investigate alternative cosmological models that address the angular size-redshift relation
  • Learn about the implications of redshift on galaxy formation and evolution
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and astrophysics researchers interested in the angular size-redshift relation and the evaluation of the L-CDM model's validity.

TrickyDicky
Messages
3,507
Reaction score
28
The angular size-redshift relation has always looked like an interesting way to test cosmological ideas since the L-CDM model predicts this apparently strange behaviour for redshifts higher than around z=1.6, but sadly is plagued with technical difficulties arisin mainly from these very high redshifts. I recently read something (Gurvits 1998) but it's quite dated and it was rather inconclusive with several observations outside the values predicted by the L-CDM model. Perhaps someone knows about more recent observations the shed light about this issue. Thanks.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The lack of observational data in accordance with the predicted increase in angular size for objects with z>1.5 is one of the many weak points of the CDM model but you won't find much information about it in this forum since they tend to ignore anything that doesn't support the standard view.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
26K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K