Exploring the Possibilities of Space Travel and Weaponry Development

  • Thread starter Thread starter Quinapalus
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores two main questions: the theoretical implications of traveling at or near the speed of light and the future development of weaponry, particularly energy-based weapons versus kinetic options. The scope includes theoretical physics, speculative technology, and practical engineering challenges.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that it is impossible to reach the speed of light, while others explore the implications of traveling at 99% of the speed of light and the potential to decelerate from that speed.
  • One participant explains that in relativity, speed is always relative to an observer, suggesting that a spaceship could theoretically accelerate to 99% of the speed of light and then decelerate back to the observer's speed.
  • Challenges in achieving such speeds are noted, including engineering difficulties and the risk of collision with slower particles.
  • Regarding weaponry, one participant mentions that while infantry weapons are likely to remain kinetic for the foreseeable future, vehicles may utilize laser technology for specific defensive purposes, such as intercepting missiles.
  • There is a mention of coilguns and uncertainty about the feasibility of plasma weapons, particularly in relation to phenomena like ball lightning.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that traveling at the speed of light is impossible, but there are differing views on the implications of traveling at 99% of that speed and the feasibility of energy-based weapons versus kinetic options. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the future of weaponry technologies.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of speed in relativity and the practical limitations of current technology in weapon development. There are unresolved questions about the effectiveness and practicality of energy-based weapons.

Quinapalus
Question #1: Let's say you had a space-ship that could accelerate to the speed light. Once you had attained this speed would it be possible to slow down from that speed? Or would this be impossible because the speed of light is constant? I'm already anticipating that some will say it's impossible to attain the speed of light in the first place. Well, what if your ship is traveling only at a mere 99% of c?

Question #2: What is the future of weaponry? Various sci-fi media like to show our heroes and villains wielding energy-based weapons. But as I understand it, it would be very difficult to harness such a huge amount of energy effectively for a small weapon and isn't really realistic. So how can we realistically expect weapons technologies to develop? (Edited for clarification)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Quinapalus said:
Question #1: Let's say you had a space-ship that could accelerate to the speed light. Once you had attained this speed would it be possible to slow down from that speed? Or would this be impossible because the speed of light is constant? I'm already anticipating that some will say it's impossible to attain the speed of light in the first place.

Right. It is impossible for us to travel at the speed of light. We can (theoretically) go very fast, like 99.999999% the speed of light, but never 100%.

Well, what if your ship is traveling only at a mere 99% of c?

One of the things to learn in relativity is that you are always traveling at a certain speed relative to something else. For all we know, we might already be traveling at 99% the speed of light relative to some observer, meaning that some observer on some far away planet might see us traveling at 99% the speed of light already. Of course, we don't see ourselves traveling the speed of light, in fact, we see ourselves not moving at all!

So let me clarify the scenario for you. You are sitting on a spaceship which is stationary on the earth. Then you leave Earth and accelerate until you are traveling 99% the speed of light relative to me, who is still sitting on the earth. Then you slow down again until I see you traveling at my speed again. Yes, this is theoretically perfectly possible. I don't know anything in physics that forbids this scenario. It's only an engineering problem. That is, we must find some way to accelerate you to 99% the speed of light. And we must somehow make sure the spaceship doesn't get destroyed by hitting some slower particles. So there are various practical challenges involved which I doubt we will ever solve, but theoretically it's possible.
 
Thanks, that really helps. :)
 
Question #2: TV trope has a section about it, Kineticsarejustbetter.
Otherwise i think infantry weapons will remain kinetics for a long time, vehicles can rather support lasers, and use them to take out inbound missiles, but they might still don't disappear (depending on laser focusing, and target tracking vs jamming efficiency).
Personally i like coilguns. We don't know too much about ball lightning, so i don't know what can be the plausability of SF plasma weapons?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 112 ·
4
Replies
112
Views
23K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
13K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K