Exponent of Group Hey! :o - Answers to Questions

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponent Group
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of the exponent of a group, denoted as $\text{exp}(G)$, and its properties, particularly in finite groups and Cartesian products of groups. Participants explore proofs related to the divisibility of the exponent by the order of the group and the relationship between the exponents of cyclic groups and their products.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a proof that $\text{exp}(G)$ divides $|G|$ and that if $G$ is cyclic, then $\text{exp}(G) = |G|$.
  • Another participant suggests a shortened version of the proof, emphasizing the minimality of $\text{exp}(G)$ and its relationship to the order of elements in the group.
  • There is a proposal to show that for a group $G$ that is the Cartesian product of groups, $\text{exp}(G)$ is a multiple of the least common multiple of the exponents of the component groups.
  • Participants discuss the implications of the relationship between $\exp(G)$, $m$, and $r$ in the context of divisibility and contradictions arising from assumptions about these values.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the identities of elements in the product of groups and how they relate to the exponent of the group.
  • One participant expresses confusion about the divisibility arguments and seeks clarification on how certain conclusions are drawn regarding $m$ and $k$.
  • Another participant corrects a previous statement about divisibility, indicating that if $r$ divides $mq + r$, then $r$ must divide $mq$.
  • There is a discussion about how $k$, a common multiple of the exponents of the component groups, relates to $m$, the least common multiple of those exponents.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the correctness of the initial proof regarding $\text{exp}(G)$ and its properties. However, there are ongoing discussions and clarifications regarding the implications of certain divisibility arguments, and no consensus is reached on all points raised.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the assumptions made in the proofs and the implications of divisibility relationships, indicating that further clarification may be needed on these points.

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

For each group $G$, $\text{exp}(G)$ is the exponent of the group $G$, i.e., the smallest positive integer $k$, such that $g^k=e$ for each $g\in G$.
Let $G$ be a finite group.
I have shown that $\text{exp}(G)$ divides $|G|$, and if $G$ is cyclic, then $\text{exp}(G)=|G|$, as follows: We asssume that $\text{exp}(G)$ doesn't divide $|G|$, then $|G|=q\cdot \text{exp}(G)+r$ with $0<r<\text{exp}(G)$.
Let $g\in G$. We have that \begin{equation*}g^{|G|}=g^{q\cdot \text{exp}(G)+r}=\left(g^{\text{exp}(G)}\right )^qg^r \Rightarrow e=e^qg^r \Rightarrow g^r=e\end{equation*}

$r$ must be a multiple of the order of $g$, $\text{ord} (g)$.
Indeed, let $r=p\cdot \text{ord} (g)+c$ with $0<c<\text{ord} (g)$, then
\begin{equation*}g^r=\left (g^{\text{ord} (g)}\right )^pg^c\Rightarrow g^c=e\end{equation*}
A contradiction, since the order of $g$ is the smallest integer such that $g^{\text{ord} (g)}=e$, but $c<\text{ord} (g)$. Since $g$ is arbitrary, we have that $r$ is a multiple of $\text{ord} (g), \ \forall g\in G$.

But $\text{exp}(G)$ is the least common multiple of $\text{ord} (g), \ \forall g\in G$, i.e.e, it must hold that $\text{exp}(G)<r$. But we have that $r<\text{exp}(G)$. A contradiction.

So, it must be $r=0$. So, $\text{exp}(G)$ divides $|G|$.
Since $G$ is cyclic there is some $g\in G$ that generates $G$. Each element of $G$ can be written as $g^n$ for some $n\in \mathbb{Z}$ and for all these elements it holds \begin{equation*}\left (g^n\right)^{|G|}=\left ( g^{|G|}\right )^n=e^n=e\end{equation*} Since $\text{exp}(G)$ isthe smallest positive integer such that $g^{\text{exp}(G)}=e$, it follows that $\text{exp}(G)\leq |G|$.

The order of $g$ is $|G|$, i.e., $|G|$ is the smallest positive integer such that $g^{|G|}=e$ and since it holds that $g^{\text{exp}(G)}=e$, it must be $|G|\leq \text{exp}(G)$.

So, it follows that $\text{exp}(G)= |G|$.
Is everything correct? (Wondering) Now I want to show that if $G$ is the cartesian product of groups $\displaystyle{G=\prod_{i=1}^n H_i}$ then $\text{exp}(G)$ is a multiple of $\text{lcm} \{\text{exp}(H_1), \ldots , \text{exp}(H_n)\}$.

Could you give me a hint how we could show that? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi mathmari,

Your proof looks good, but it can be shortened as follows:

Let $|G| = q \cdot \exp(G) + r$, where $q$ and $r$ are integers with $0 \le r < \exp(G)$. For every $g\in G$, $g^r = g^{|G|}(g^{\exp(G)})^{-q} = e$. By minimality of $\exp(G)$, $r = 0$; therefore, $|G| = q\cdot \exp(G)$, proving $\exp(G)\, |\, |G|$. If $G$ is cyclic, let $x$ be a generator of $G$. Since $x^{\exp(G)} = 1$, the order of $x$ divides $\exp(G)$; as the order of $x$ is $|G|$, then $|G|\, |\, \exp(G)$. It was already shown that $\exp(G)\, |\, |G|$, so we have $\exp(G) = |G|$.

To answer your last question, let $m = \operatorname{lcm}\{\exp(H_1),\ldots, \exp(H_n)\}$. Set $\exp(G) = mq + r$, for some integers $q$ and $r$ with $0 \le r < m$. Take an arbitrary element $(h_1,\ldots, h_n)\in G$. For $1 \le i \le n$, let $e_i$ be the identity of $H_i$. Then for all $i$, $h_i^m = (h_i^{\exp(H_i)})^{m/\exp(H_i)} = e_i^{m/\exp(H_i)} = e_i$. Consequently, for every $i$, $h_i^r = h_i^{\exp(G)}(h_i^m)^{-q} = e_i$. Therefore, $(h_1,\ldots, h_n)^r = (e_1,\ldots, e_n)$. Suppose $r > 0$. Since the element $(h_1,\ldots, h_n)$ was arbitrary, it follows that $\exp(G)$ divides $r$. In view of the equation $\exp(G) = mq + r$, we deduce $m$ divides $r$, contradicting the inequality $r < m$. Therefore, $r = 0$ and $m$ divides $\exp(G)$, as desired.
 
Euge said:
Your proof looks good, but it can be shortened as follows:

Let $|G| = q \cdot \exp(G) + r$, where $q$ and $r$ are integers with $0 \le r < \exp(G)$. For every $g\in G$, $g^r = g^{|G|}(g^{\exp(G)})^{-q} = e$. By minimality of $\exp(G)$, $r = 0$; therefore, $|G| = q\cdot \exp(G)$, proving $\exp(G)\, |\, |G|$. If $G$ is cyclic, let $x$ be a generator of $G$. Since $x^{\exp(G)} = 1$, the order of $x$ divides $\exp(G)$; as the order of $x$ is $|G|$, then $|G|\, |\, \exp(G)$. It was already shown that $\exp(G)\, |\, |G|$, so we have $\exp(G) = |G|$.

Ah ok! (Smile)
Euge said:
To answer your last question, let $m = \operatorname{lcm}\{\exp(H_1),\ldots, \exp(H_n)\}$. Set $\exp(G) = mq + r$, for some integers $q$ and $r$ with $0 \le r < m$. Take an arbitrary element $(h_1,\ldots, h_n)\in G$. For $1 \le i \le n$, let $e_i$ be the identity of $H_i$. Then for all $i$, $h_i^m = (h_i^{\exp(H_i)})^{m/\exp(H_i)} = e_i^{m/\exp(H_i)} = e_i$. Consequently, for every $i$, $h_i^r = h_i^{\exp(G)}(h_i^m)^{-q} = e_i$.

We have that $(h_1,\ldots, h_n)\in G$. From that it follows that $ h_i^{\exp(G)}=e$, right? (Wondering)
Euge said:
Therefore, $(h_1,\ldots, h_n)^r = (e_1,\ldots, e_n)$. Suppose $r > 0$. Since the element $(h_1,\ldots, h_n)$ was arbitrary, it follows that $\exp(G)$ divides $r$. In view of the equation $\exp(G) = mq + r$, we deduce $m$ divides $r$, contradicting the inequality $r < m$. Therefore, $r = 0$ and $m$ divides $\exp(G)$, as desired.

Since $\exp(G)$ divides $r$ and $\exp(G) = mq + r$ how do we conlcude that $m$ divides $r$ ? Can it not be that $q$ divides $r$ ? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
We have that $(h_1,\ldots, h_n)\in G$. From that it follows that $ h_i^{\exp(G)}=e$, right? (Wondering)
If by $e$ you mean $e_i$, then yes that's right. (Yes)
mathmari said:
Since $\exp(G)$ divides $r$ and $\exp(G) = mq + r$ how do we conlcude that $m$ divides $r$ ? Can it not be that $q$ divides $r$ ? (Wondering)

If $\exp(G)$ divides $r$, then since $\exp(G) = mq + r$, then $mq + r$ divides $r$. Hence, $mq$ divides $r$. Since $m$ divides $mq$ and $mq$ divides $r$, then $m$ divides $r$.
 
Euge said:
If by $e$ you mean $e_i$, then yes that's right. (Yes)


If $\exp(G)$ divides $r$, then since $\exp(G) = mq + r$, then $mq + r$ divides $r$. Hence, $mq$ divides $r$. Since $m$ divides $mq$ and $mq$ divides $r$, then $m$ divides $r$.
I got it! (Happy) If the groups $H_1, \ldots , H_n$ are cyclic we have from above that $\exp (H_i)=|H_i|$.
So, we have that $\text{lcm}\{|H_1|,\ldots, |H_n|\}$ divides $\exp (G)$, right? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
If the groups $H_1, \ldots , H_n$ are cyclic we have from above that $\exp (H_i)=|H_i|$.
So, we have that $\text{lcm}\{|H_1|,\ldots, |H_n|\}$ divides $\exp (G)$, right? (Wondering)

Yes, that's correct.
 
Thank you very much! (Happy)
 
Euge said:
If $\exp(G)$ divides $r$, then since $\exp(G) = mq + r$, then $mq + r$ divides $r$. Hence, $mq$ divides $r$. Since $m$ divides $mq$ and $mq$ divides $r$, then $m$ divides $r$.

I thought about this again and now I got stuck. Knowing that $mq + r$ divides $r$ how do we get that $mq$ divides $r$ ? (Wondering)
 
That was an error on my part. It should go the other way: if $r$ divides $mq + r$, then $r$ divides $mq$. I will alter the proof the second theorem as follows (using the same meaning of $m$):

For every $(h_1,\ldots, h_n)\in G$, $(h_1,\ldots, h_n)^m = (h_1^m,\ldots, h_n^m) = (e_1^{m/\exp(H_1)},\ldots, e_n^{m/\exp(H_n)}) = (e_1,\dots, e_n)$. Furthermore, if $k$ is a positive integer such that $(h_1,\ldots, h_n)^k = (e_1,\ldots, e_n)$ for all $(h_1,\ldots, h_n)\in G$, then for each $i\in \{1,\ldots, n\}$, $h_i^k = e_i$ for all $h_i\in H_i$. Hence, $\exp(H_i)$ divides $k$ for all $i$. This means $m$ divides $k$, so $m \le k$. This shows that $m$ is the least positive integer for which $(h_1,\ldots, h_n)^m = (e_1,\ldots, e_n)$ for all $(h_1,\ldots, h_n) \in G$. Thus, $m = \exp(G)$.
 
  • #10
Euge said:
Hence, $\exp(H_i)$ divides $k$ for all $i$. This means $m$ divides $k$, so $m \le k$.

How do we get that $m$ divides $k$ ? (Wondering)

We have that $\exp(H_i)$ divides $k$ and $\exp(H_i)$ divides $m$, or not? (Wondering)
 
  • #11
I have have shown that $k$ is a common multiple of the $\exp(H_i)$. Since $m$ is the least common multiple of the $\exp(H_i)$, then $k$ is a multiple of $m$.
 
  • #12
Euge said:
I have have shown that $k$ is a common multiple of the $\exp(H_i)$. Since $m$ is the least common multiple of the $\exp(H_i)$, then $k$ is a multiple of $m$.

Ahh I see! Thank you so much! (Smile)
 
  • #13
I got stuck right now... Which is the difference between the order of a group and the exponent of a group? (Wondering)
 
  • #14
The order of a group $G$ is equal to the number of elements in $G$, if $G$ is finite. If $G$ is infinite, we say that $G$ has infinite order.

The exponent of $G$ is defined as the least positive integer $n$ such that $g^n = e$ for every $g \in G$.

To see the difference, consider the Vierergruppe $\Bbb Z/2\Bbb Z \times \Bbb Z/2\Bbb Z$. Its order is $4$ (as the name suggests), but its exponent is $2$, since every non-identity element has order $2$.
 
  • #15
And why does it hold that $g^{|G|}=e$, for $g\in G$ ? (Wondering)
 
  • #16
That's when $G$ is finite, and it follows from Lagrange's theorem: If $H$ is a subgroup of a finite group $G$, then $\lvert H\rvert$ divides $\lvert G\rvert$. Indeed, if $G$ is finite and $g\in G$ has order $m$, then the cyclic subgroup generated by $g$ has order $m$, and hence $m$ divides $\lvert G\rvert$ by Lagrange. Letting $\lvert G\rvert = km$ for some integer $k$, $g^{\lvert G\rvert} = g^{km} = (g^m)^k = e^k = e$.
 
  • #17
Euge said:
That's when $G$ is finite, and it follows from Lagrange's theorem: If $H$ is a subgroup of a finite group $G$, then $\lvert H\rvert$ divides $\lvert G\rvert$. Indeed, if $G$ is finite and $g\in G$ has order $m$, then the cyclic subgroup generated by $g$ has order $m$, and hence $m$ divides $\lvert G\rvert$ by Lagrange. Letting $\lvert G\rvert = km$ for some integer $k$, $g^{\lvert G\rvert} = g^{km} = (g^m)^k = e^k = e$.

I understand! Thank you so much! (Smile)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K