Expressing non-basis columns as a linear combination

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 3K views
mattyk
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A= \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 1 & 1 & 2 & 5 \\ 2 & 3 & 1 & -1 & -5 \\ 1 & 0 & 2 & 0 & -1 \\ 1 & 2 & 0 & 1 & 2 \end{bmatrix}

Homework Equations


I get this RREF
\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 2 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & -1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 3 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}

Rank = 3
I'm then asked to write a column basis which is the 1st, 2nd & 4th column

3. The Attempt at a Solution


The question then asks
"Express each non-basis column of A as a linear combination of basis elements"

I'm just asking for a little clarity on the question and then exactly how do I express it.

Am I being asked to express the 3rd and 5th column (the non-basis columns) as a linear combination?
And if so what does that look like? All my searching is just making me more confused?
 
on Phys.org
mattyk said:

Homework Statement


A= \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 1 & 1 & 2 & 5 \\ 2 & 3 & 1 & -1 & -5 \\ 1 & 0 & 2 & 0 & -1 \\ 1 & 2 & 0 & 1 & 2 \end{bmatrix}

Homework Equations


I get this RREF
\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 2 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & -1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 3 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}

Rank = 3
I'm then asked to write a column basis which is the 1st, 2nd & 4th column

3. The Attempt at a Solution


The question then asks
"Express each non-basis column of A as a linear combination of basis elements"

I'm just asking for a little clarity on the question and then exactly how do I express it.

Am I being asked to express the 3rd and 5th column (the non-basis columns) as a linear combination?
And if so what does that look like? All my searching is just making me more confused?
Since your work shows the 1st, 2nd, and 4th columns to be linearly independent, and therefore a basis for the column space (I didn't check your work for accuracy), then it must be the case that the 3rd and 5th columns are a linear combination of the 1st, 2nd, and 4th columns. Write an equation to express the fact that the 3rd column is equal to ##c_1<\text{col. 1}> + c_2<\text{col. 2}> + c_4<\text{col. 4}>##, and determine the constants ##c_1, c_2,## and ##c_4##. Do the same sort of thing to show that the 5th column is a linear comb. of those three column vectors.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mattyk
Just to make sure I have this right
I go on to work out

c1(1, 2, 1, 1) + c2(1, 3, 0, 2) + c4(2, -1, 0, 1) = (1, 1, 2, 0)

and

c1(1, 2, 1, 1) + c2(1, 3, 0, 2) + c4(2, -1, 0, 1) = (5, -5, -1, 2).

And this shows that c3 and c5 are linear combinations of c1, c2 & c4?
 
Mark44 said:
Since your work shows the 1st, 2nd, and 4th columns to be linearly independent, and therefore a basis for the column space (I didn't check your work for accuracy), then it must be the case that the 3rd and 5th columns are a linear combination of the 1st, 2nd, and 4th columns. Write an equation to express the fact that the 3rd column is equal to ##c_1<\text{col. 1}> + c_2<\text{col. 2}> + c_4<\text{col. 4}>##, and determine the constants ##c_1, c_2,## and ##c_4##. Do the same sort of thing to show that the 5th column is a linear comb. of those three column vectors.

Just to make sure I have this right
I go on to work out

c1(1, 2, 1, 1) + c2(1, 3, 0, 2) + c4(2, -1, 0, 1) = (1, 1, 2, 0)

and

c1(1, 2, 1, 1) + c2(1, 3, 0, 2) + c4(2, -1, 0, 1) = (5, -5, -1, 2).

And this shows that c3 and c5 are linear combinations of c1, c2 & c4?
 
mattyk said:
Just to make sure I have this right
I go on to work out

c1(1, 2, 1, 1) + c2(1, 3, 0, 2) + c4(2, -1, 0, 1) = (1, 1, 2, 0)

and

c1(1, 2, 1, 1) + c2(1, 3, 0, 2) + c4(2, -1, 0, 1) = (5, -5, -1, 2).

And this shows that c3 and c5 are linear combinations of c1, c2 & c4?
Don't use the same constants in each equation, since c1 in the first equation is not likely to be the same as c1 in the second equation.

The equations above don't show anything until you actually solve for the constants.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mattyk
mattyk said:
Just to make sure I have this right
I go on to work out

c1(1, 2, 1, 1) + c2(1, 3, 0, 2) + c4(2, -1, 0, 1) = (1, 1, 2, 0)
So (c1, 2c1, c1, c1)+ (c2, 3c2, 0, 2c2)+ (2c4, -c4, 0, c4)= (1, 1, 2, 0)
(c1+ c2+ 2c4, 2c1+ 3c2- c4, c1, c1+ 2c2+ c1)= (1, 1, 2, 0)
c1+ c2+ 2c4= 1
2c1+ 3c2- c4= 1
c1= 2
c1+ 2c2+ c4= 0

Now solve for c1, c2, c3 and c4

and

d1(1, 2, 1, 1) + d2(1, 3, 0, 2) + d4(2, -1, 0, 1) = (5, -5, -1, 2).
I've changed your "c"s to "d"s. They are not necessarily the same coefficients as before.

And this shows that c3 and c5 are linear combinations of c1, c2 & c4?
No! The "c"s (and "d"s) are numbers. It is the vectors that are linear combinations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mattyk