Ext Functor on Noetherian Affine Schemes

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Euge
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the relationship between the Ext functor and sheaf cohomology on Noetherian affine schemes. It establishes that for finitely generated modules ##M## and ##N## over a Noetherian ring ##R##, the associated sheaf of the module ##\operatorname{Ext}^q_R(M,N)## is equivalent to the Ext sheaf ##\mathscr{E}xt^q_{\mathcal{O}_X}(\tilde{M},\tilde{N})##. This conclusion is derived using the Grothendieck definition of cohomology, properties of injective modules, and the behavior of the Tilda functor with respect to kernels and cokernels. The discussion emphasizes that for finitely generated modules, the computation of Ext can be simplified by utilizing injective resolutions and the commutation of Hom with localization.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Noetherian rings and their properties
  • Familiarity with finitely generated modules over rings
  • Knowledge of sheaf theory and the Tilda functor
  • Experience with Grothendieck's definition of cohomology and injective resolutions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Tilda functor in the context of sheaf theory
  • Learn about injective resolutions of modules over Noetherian rings
  • Explore the relationship between sheaf cohomology and derived functors
  • Investigate applications of Ext sheaves in algebraic geometry
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians and researchers in algebraic geometry, particularly those focusing on sheaf cohomology, module theory, and the applications of Ext functors in Noetherian settings.

Euge
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
2,072
Reaction score
245
Let ##M## and ##N## be finitely generated modules over a Noetherian ring ##R##. For every ##R##-module ##S## let ##\tilde{S}## be the associated sheaf on the affine scheme ##X = \operatorname{Spec}R##. Show that for all ##q \ge 0##, the associated sheaf of the ##R##-module ##\operatorname{Ext}^q_R(M,N)## is the Ext sheaf ##\mathscr{E}xt^q_{\mathcal{O}_X}(\tilde{M},\tilde{N})##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
Physics news on Phys.org
Since ##M## is finite over Noetherian ring ##R##, there is a finitely generated free resolution ##\cdots \to L_1 \to L_0 \to M \to 0## for ##M##. Applying the tilde functor yields a resolution of ##\tilde{M}## by finite locally free ##\mathcal{O}_X##-modules ##\cdots \to \tilde{L}_1 \to \tilde{L}_0 \to \tilde{M} \to 0##. Hence ##\mathscr{E}xt^q_{\mathcal{O}_X}(\tilde{M}, \tilde{N})## is the ##q##-th cohomology of the complex ##\mathscr{H}om_{\mathcal{O}_X}(\tilde{L}^\cdot, \tilde{N})##. There is an natural isomorphism of complexes ##\mathscr{H}om_{\mathcal{O}_X}(\tilde{L}^\cdot, \tilde{N}) = \widetilde{\text{Hom}_{\mathcal{O}_X}(L^\cdot, N)}## and cohomology commutes with the tilde functor; furthermore, the ##q##th cohomology of ##\text{Hom}_{\mathcal{O}_X}(L^\cdot, N)## is ##\text{Ext}^q_R(M,N)##. Therefore ##\mathscr{E}xt^q_{\mathcal{O}_X}(\tilde{M}, \tilde{N}) \cong \widetilde{\text{Ext}^q_R(M,N)}##, as desired.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
Using the Grothendieck definition of cohomology by injective resolutions, the fact that Tilda of an injective R module is an injective O_X module, that Tilda commutes with kernels and cokernels, and is a fully faithful equivalence from R modules to O_X modules, this seems to reduce to the case of "sheaf Hom", i.e. sheaf Ext^0, where it seems to follow from the fact that on finitely generated modules (actually we seem only to need M finitely generated), Hom commutes with localization.

I.e. to compute Ext, take an injective R module resolution J(*) of N, and apply Hom(M,_), to get a complex C = Hom(M,J(*)), whose cohomology is Ext*(M,N). Applying Tilda to C, gives a complex whose cohomology is Tilda of Ext, since Tilda preserves kernels and cokernels. But since Hom commutes with localization for finitely generated M, applying Tilda to C is the same as first applying Tilda to J, getting an injective O_X module resolution of NTilda, and then applying sheafHom(MTilda,_), to get the complex whose cohomology is sheafExt. Hence sheafExt is Tilda of Ext in this case.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K