A Extra (boundary?) term in Brans Dicke field equations

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the Brans-Dicke field equations and the presence of an additional term involving second derivatives of the scalar field φ. The action provided incorporates ordinary matter through the term L_m, leading to the derived equations of motion. A key point is the identification of a boundary term that arises from the variation of the Ricci scalar when multiplied by φ, which is not negligible if φ is not constant. This additional term is crucial for understanding the dynamics of the Brans-Dicke theory. The conversation highlights the importance of recognizing how variations in the scalar field influence the resulting field equations.
ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
1,387
Here is the action:
##S = \frac{1}{16\pi} \int d^4 x \sqrt{-g} (R\phi - \frac{\omega}{\phi} g^{ab} \phi_{,a} \phi_{,b} + 16\pi L_m)##
the ordinary matter is included via ##L_m##. Zeroing the variation ##\delta/\delta g^{\mu \nu}## in the usual way gives

##\frac{\delta}{\delta g^{\mu \nu}}[R\phi - \frac{\omega}{\phi} g^{ab} \phi_{,a} \phi_{,b}] + \frac{1}{\sqrt{-g}}(R\phi - \frac{\omega}{\phi} g^{ab} \phi_{,a} \phi_{,b}) \frac{\delta(\sqrt{-g})}{\delta g^{\mu \nu}} - 8\pi T_{\mu \nu} = 0##

where ##T_{\mu \nu} = \frac{-2}{\sqrt{-g}} \frac{\delta(\sqrt{-g}L_m)}{\delta g^{\mu \nu}}## is the stress energy of the matter. Inserting the variations of ##R## and ##\sqrt{-g}## (which are ##R_{\mu \nu}## and ##-\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{-g} g_{\mu \nu}## respectively) gives

##G_{\mu \nu} + \frac{\omega}{\phi^2}(\frac{1}{2}g^{ab} \phi_{,a} \phi_{,b} g_{\mu \nu} - \phi_{,\mu} \phi_{,\nu}) = 8\pi T_{\mu \nu}/\phi##

On Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brans–Dicke_theory#The_field_equations) there is another term ##\frac{1}{\phi}(\nabla_a \nabla_b \phi - g_{ab} \square \phi)##. I suspect it is a boundary term? Where did it come from.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ergospherical said:
I suspect it is a boundary term? Where did it come from.
Your suspicion is correct. By the Palatini identity, the general variation of the Ricci scalar is:$$\delta R=R_{\mu\nu}\delta g^{\mu\nu}+\nabla_{\sigma}\left(g^{\mu\nu}\delta\Gamma_{\mu\nu}^{\sigma}-g^{\mu\sigma}\delta\Gamma_{\lambda\mu}^{\lambda}\right)\tag{1}$$For the Einstein-Hilbert action, the last term on the right is dropped because it's a total divergence that integrates to an ignorable boundary term. But for the Brans-Dicke action, we multiply the full variation (1) by ##\phi## to get:$$\phi\delta R=\phi R_{\mu\nu}\delta g^{\mu\nu}+\phi\nabla_{\sigma}\left(g^{\mu\nu}\delta\Gamma_{\mu\nu}^{\sigma}-g^{\mu\sigma}\delta\Gamma_{\lambda\mu}^{\lambda}\right)$$$$=\phi R_{\mu\nu}\delta g^{\mu\nu}-\left(\nabla_{\sigma}\phi\right)\left(g^{\mu\nu}\delta\Gamma_{\mu\nu}^{\sigma}-g^{\mu\sigma}\delta\Gamma_{\lambda\mu}^{\lambda}\right)+\nabla_{\sigma}\left(\phi\left(g^{\mu\nu}\delta\Gamma_{\mu\nu}^{\sigma}-g^{\mu\sigma}\delta\Gamma_{\lambda\mu}^{\lambda}\right)\right)$$Again we ignore the last term as a divergence, but the second part is non-zero whenever ##\phi \neq \text{constant}##, and is responsible for the additional terms in the Brans-Dicke field-equations that involve second-derivatives of ##\phi##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes ergospherical
Interesting - thank you.
 
Moderator's note: Spin-off from another thread due to topic change. In the second link referenced, there is a claim about a physical interpretation of frame field. Consider a family of observers whose worldlines fill a region of spacetime. Each of them carries a clock and a set of mutually orthogonal rulers. Each observer points in the (timelike) direction defined by its worldline's tangent at any given event along it. What about the rulers each of them carries ? My interpretation: each...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
468
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
839
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
889
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K