A Extra terms in the Action in Zee chapter 1.3?

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter looseleaf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Terms
looseleaf
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
Hi, could someone please explain where the tau and sigma terms come from in this expression:

Screen Shot 2019-09-20 at 10.47.53 PM.png

I see the kinetic energy and quadratic "mattress" potential terms, but the tau and sigma kinda come out of nowhere. Where are they from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
These are just arbitrary coupling constants. They originate from the self interaction energy V of the field ##\varphi## with itself in equation (2). It is a way of expressing the self interaction part of the arbitrary function V in a series of ##\varphi##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes looseleaf
Hans de Vries said:
These are just arbitrary coupling constants. They originate from the self interaction energy V of the field ##\varphi## with itself in equation (2). It is a way of expressing the self interaction part of the arbitrary function V in a series of ##\varphi##.

Thanks that makes sense.

I was wondering if anyone could address another question I had?
This one is from the Sidney Coleman lectures (2.72)

##e^{i P . x}\alpha(p)e^{-i P . x} = e^{-i p . x}\alpha(p)##

i'm confused why we drop the operator on the right side when we go from 3-momentum to 4-momentum?
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
This is still a great mystery, Einstein called it ""spooky action at a distance" But science and mathematics are full of concepts which at first cause great bafflement but in due course are just accepted. In the case of Quantum Mechanics this gave rise to the saying "Shut up and calculate". In other words, don't try to "understand it" just accept that the mathematics works. The square root of minus one is another example - it does not exist and yet electrical engineers use it to do...
Back
Top