MHB F.6.1 - Interest Rate Fundamentals

AI Thread Summary
Carl Foster is analyzing the real rate of return investors expect, using the current 5.5% rate on 3-month U.S. Treasury bills and a 3% inflation rate based on the Consumer Price Index. He aims to estimate the real rate of return by applying the formula for nominal interest rates, which includes the inflation premium. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between nominal rates, inflation, and real returns. Participants seek clarification on the symbols used in the formula and share resources for further understanding. The conversation underscores the relevance of interest rate fundamentals in investment decision-making.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
$6–1$ Interest rate fundamentals:
The real rate of return Carl Foster,atrainee at an investment banking firm,
is trying to get an idea of what real rate of return investors are expecting in today’s marketplace.
He has looked up the rate paid on $3-$month U.S.Treasury bills and found it to be $5.5\%$ .
Hehasdecidedtousethe rate of change in the Consumer Price Index as a proxy for the inflationary expectations of investors.
That annualized rate now stands at $3\%$.
On the basis of the information that Carl has collected,
what estimate can he make of the real rate of return?

$\text{$k^∗$=real rate of interest}\\$
$\text{$P^∗$=inflation preminum}\\$
$\text{$RP^∗$=risk premimum}\\$
$$K_1=k^∗ +IP $$

ok this is probably simple
but the wording is ?

ok i realize it would be hard to answer this w\o the text
so here is the link its chp 6 problems

https://www.dropbox.com/s/fl2iq63it...ples-of-Managerial-Finance-by-Gitman.pdf?dl=0
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Can't get to your link...

However, your symbols are kinda strange:
can you clarify each of them...thank you.

Here's a site that may help you out:
Nominal Interest Rate
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top