MHB Factor Rings of Polynomials Over a Field

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on Theorem 1 from Nicholson's "Introduction to Abstract Algebra," which states that for a non-zero ideal A of the polynomial ring F[x], there exists a unique monic polynomial h such that A = (h). The proof begins by asserting that since A is non-zero, it must contain non-zero polynomials, which leads to the question of why A must also contain monic polynomials. It is clarified that if a polynomial p(x) in A has a leading coefficient a_n that is non-zero, then the polynomial q(x) obtained by dividing p(x) by a_n is also in A and is monic. This demonstrates that every non-zero ideal in F[x] indeed contains monic polynomials, confirming the theorem's assertion.
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
On page 222 of Nicholson: Introduction to Abstract Algebra in his section of Factor Rings of Polynomials Over a Field we find Theorem 1 stated as follows: (see attached)

Theorem 1. Let F be a field and let A \ne 0 be an ideal of F[x]. Then a uniquely determined monic polynomial h exists exists in F[x] such that A = (h).

The beginning of the proof reads as follows:

Proof: Because A \ne 0, it contains non-zero polynomials and hence contains monic polynomials (being an ideal) ... ... etc. etc.

BUT! why must A contain monic polynomials??

Help with this matter would be appreciated!

Peter

[This has also been posted on MHF]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
BUT! why must A contain monic polynomials??

Suppose $p(x)=a_nx^n+\ldots+a_1x+a_0\in A$ and $a_n\ne 0$. As $A$ is an ideal of $F[x]$, $q(x)=\dfrac{1}{a_n}p(x)$ belongs to $A$ and $q(x)$ is monic.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
765
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K